Considering, on Sept 11th, two planes hit two towers why then did three buildings collapse?

Question

Before giving me an emotional or preconceived answer please examine this web site with an open mind.

www.wtc7.net

http://www.wtc7.net/

sorry I'll hyperlink it for you

Answer 1

Oh how people hate us who keep bringing this up!!
I think I watched that one.I think I have watched them all.I read the 9/11 commission report and the new pearl harbour by Griffin.And the gagged witness statements released by the New york times last august 2005 from Firemen and the like.
No one will really address your question properly and oppose it because all they have to go on is thatit was a fluke the way the building came down.
The reasons that "prove" demolitions were involved and the govt was at least complicit are overwhelming.I mean there is even a picture that clearly shows 2 firemen standing in the wreckage .Behind the fireman is a steel box column that shows a cutting pattern and steel melted from that pattern consistent with a set directional cutting charge and totally inconsistent with something cut with a torch.
here is the link .Scroll to the bottom when you find it.No one disputes the accuracy or veracity of this pictuer
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/240406thermiteidentified.htm
oh and for all you disbelievers.TH e building(s) sufferred asymetrical damage.Yet they collapsed in a symetrical manner.I cant find A SINGLE EXAMPLE of this happenning anywhere in the world for any reason.Yet it happenned 3 times in one day in the same block in the same city.
YES the planes hit the buildings.But it was known beforehand and the job was finished with explosives so we could go to war!!Why is this so hard to believe.Disinformation,propaganda and counter propaganda are the tools of govt and have been for centuries.Why is this so amazing?
Also why is it that "the conspiracy nuts" are accused of hating America?where does that idea come from?Exposing lies and BS from on high does nt mean that one hates anything.It only means that accountability is demanded.Is that not the American way ?
The building came down from a quake caused by the twin towers?Okay then ,show me any building anywhere that came down in such a symetrical fashion from seismic activity

Answer 2

The generally agreed sequence of events is that the planes caused huge fires in the buildings (the planes, like most planes, had wings full of fuel, so when they hit the buildings all that fuel splashed all over the towers and caught fire). There have been accusations that the fire proofing protction on the steel supports within the building had been improperly maintained, meaning that the fire caused the supports to heat, buckle and then break. The meant that the top halves of the towers collapsed down on top of the lower halves, essentially completely destroying the whole tower. The delay was caused by the amount of time it took for ther fires to destroy the steel supports. The main problem wiht your theory is that it seems like a rather superfluous thing for the terrorists to try and do. They've already crashed airliners into the buildings, why spend more time and more money and run more risks by trying to bomb the buildings as well?

Answer 3

Building 7 had extensive damage which would have caused it to loose all power and for too long for emergancy power.

Also remember that it contained some sort of government bunker ( plus god only knows what else)

It is very possible that anything from unstable chemicals, to very classified documents were stored there.
I don't think anyone has a problem with the idea that the government blew that building for government security or because of a possible leak of some stored material.

The trouble is that everyone wants to blame the US for the twin towers, which were actually hit by planes.

Answer 4

Hello:

OK, I'm open minded. I am not an expert nor have I had a chance to examine the actual site. Trying to make an opinion on a photograph narrated by someone I have never met is irresponsible on my part.

My thoughts. The intense heat generated by the other towers may have violated the integrity of the structure. It stated, "fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper." However, I know of no other fire that had been started by high-octane jet plane fuel.

Another problem was "pancaking". That was the result of one floor collapsing onto another floor causing that floor to collapse, etc., etc., etc. Similar to the domino effect.

I guess if you want to think of this as a conspiracy, you can. Myself, I want to put it to rest. Let us never forget the circumstances behind this horrific tragedy.

Answer 5

The third building fell for the same reason as there is tremors after an earthquake. The vibration was so great from the twin towers falling it was as if there was a quake right next to the other building. That was a huge seismic action there at ground zero.

This is why they evacuate the neighbors when your house is the one on fire.

Answer 6

Nothing like this have happened because...

Nothing like the Twin Towers have been hit by modern jets before, and nothing like the Twin Towers falling and debris piling up so close to this building has happened before.

Answer 7

Maybe you can look at the footage of the planes hitting the buildings and explain how it did not happen?
If you hate America so much, move to Mexico, plenty of room for you there.

Answer 8

Do you really understand the enormous devastation from the impact of the planes to the collapsing of the towers?? People will believe whatever they are led to believe. The truth is: WE WERE ATTACKED!!! Some will seek anything they can to keep putting this country down.

Answer 9

The weight of the debris created by the first two towers. They did not stack up nice and neatly you know.

Answer 10

Apparently it was the fires that brought them all down. Go check out Loose Change. (Google Video)