English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

please help

2006-10-30 13:09:52 · 10 answers · asked by ill_usionary 1 in Health Men's Health

10 answers

if you are not circumcised and want to get the look of a circumcised penis, you will not get the desired look unless you have the procedure. stretching skin will only increase the look of an uncut penis. too much skin needs removal by an urologist. good luck.

2006-10-30 13:17:46 · answer #1 · answered by SNAPPER 1 · 0 1

If you're talking about being able to retract your foreskin fully so you can see your entire glans, then yes, there are ways of stretching it so it can work without having to resort to circumcision.

In the vast majority of cases stretching exercises work. Take two fingers and stretch the opening of the foreskin as far as it'll go without pain (like increasing its radius) by hooking a finger on either side of the opening. It's a little hard to describe and may take a few tries to get right, but once you do, do this for a few minutes each day. After a few weeks to a month the opening should be large enough to all you to retract fully. If this doesn't work, there are prescription creams that when combined with this should help.

If that doesn't work there are surgical interventions, with a full circumcision being the most severe. See links for the alternatives. Circumcision should only really be considered if all other methods fail, and disregard anyone who suggests you get circumcised outright because that's probably not needed unless your foreskin is causing you a lot of pain upon erection.

2006-10-30 17:40:29 · answer #2 · answered by trebla_5 6 · 1 0

Your doctor never should have sent your son home while he was still bleeding. That was a horrible move for your doctor and to be honest I think he needs to have his license removed and be taken out of medicine. Infants can bleed to death very quickly. A table spoon of blood to an infant is a pint of blood to an adult. Also it does not matter how much foreskin your son had, that was a bold faced lie. You need to report these doctors to the head of the hospital. What happens with a plastibell procedure is that when a baby is born his foreskin is attached to the head of his penis. Now no matter how much foreskin he has, only the part touching the head is attached. If he had more foreskin that usual it would just hang down past the head. When they do the plastibell the rip apart the head of thepenis and the foreskin. Then they place a plastic bell over the head and slide the foreskin over it. Then they tie the foreskin off and send him home. Eventually the foreskin will die from lack of blood flow and then falll off. The amount of foreskin makes no difference in the amount of bleeding. It sounds like way too much skin was removed and this will cause your son horrible problems in the future. If he doesn't have enough room for an erection now, wait untill he's 18 and has a 6inch + penis that has to fit in that skin. If I were you I would report and sue the doctor that did anything to your child. Show your son to your family and realise that circumcision isn't the best idea. Then have a urologist look at your child. I feel horrible for you and your son. -Connor

2016-03-13 06:51:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

hmmm - seems to be bit of confusion or conflict in the wording of your question. First, foreskin is designed to cover and protect the glans/head of the penis and even though it can be retracted for cleaning and when putting on a condom, it will probably not get all the way to the base of the penis. Second, if you get circumcised, you won't have foreskin thus it cannot get to the base but neither will it be there to protect the head.

That said, if you cannot retract yoru foreskin to fully expose the head of your penis, then you do need to do some stretching to loosen it up enough to be easily retracted. Once you are well, into puberty, the foreskin should be retracted for cleaning on a daily basis; more often if you are sexually avtive or participate in activities that get you all hot and sweaty like sports.

There are several web sites (see below) that offer instruction on stretching as well as suggesting topical, steroidal ointments that can help if stretching by itself isn't quite working. As for cleaning, whether your foreskin retracts fully or not, always retract it as far as it will go and wash everything thoroughly with warm water and soap then rinse off all the soap residue before drying the genital area thoroughly.

If you work at the stretching daily, it will produce results in a few months. If it seems to be takign too long ask yoru pharmacist or doctor for one of the ointments that will help.

2006-11-01 04:46:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If your foreskin is tight because you haven't been cleaning it properly you should get into a warm bath and soap up your penis well. Then gently move it back and forth. It will feel good and you will get hard.

Repeat this exercise daily and gradually the foreskin will free up. You might even get some white gooey stuff come out of the eye of the penis. This will feel good too.

Repeating this exercise will give lots of pleasure and you won't need a circumscision. Once it is free use some baby oil to keep it lubricated.

2006-10-30 13:36:10 · answer #5 · answered by captncluise 2 · 2 0

This Site Might Help You.

RE:
Is there a way to get the foreskin back to the base with stretching instead of circumcision?
please help

2015-08-26 18:13:37 · answer #6 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

You can stretch it back to the base alright, but only a good circumcision will keep it there. A surgeon can - upon your request keep a great deal of the foreskin with all the luscious nerve ending & sensation & suture it far up upon the shaft - close to the pubic bone. this is a variation & will let you have most of your pleasure nerves as well as the exposed glans & the sleek style of a cut penis. I used to experiment with Krazy glue (cyanoacrylate) till I got my surgery done. I'd glue it back to the pubes.

2006-10-30 15:03:05 · answer #7 · answered by blackbird 4 · 0 3

Yes, you can get it back eventually by working on ot, but it is FAR BETTER TO HAVE A CIRCUMCISION. Circumcision will rid you of your foreskin once and for all. You'll have better sex, better penile appearance, better hygiene, better comfort and better self esteem. Don't hesitate to be circumcised - you'll wish you had been done years earlier afterwards!

2006-10-30 20:19:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Yes, use conservative treatments, see below.
But remember, the foreskin may not go back until puberty and that is considered to be a normal(different men, different age).




The “medical” reasons for circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
Circumcision is “nothing” compared to other much more terrible things that people do for MONEY, when MONEY is involved EVERYRHING is possible, MONEY is the priority not moral values, not ethics, not health, not wrong or right, not even human life, etc. People are selfish by nature. And that is soooo sad. $$$CASH$$$

MOTHERS, the feelings of mothers who observed the circumcision of their babies. Go here if you have the courage:
http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm
They do not remember the pain when they grow up, but I wonder what kind of neurological/emotional damage it does to inflict such severe pain to such a young one!

In the US circumcision started to stop boys from masturbating; they will take much longer to reach the orgasm, and the orgasm will not be as intense, but that will not stop them.
Nowadays the “medical” reasons to circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!

RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
Also, if you examine the bible, lest just say that is full of terrible things that are considered very illegal nowadays, and many of those terrible things are AGAINST WOMEN. Women, how would you like it if those things get legalized?
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/

HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more “smegma”, all kinds of discharges, wetness, and smells; because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Women are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.

MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. It is not a birth defect! A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. And what is even greater is the chance of breast cancer so the best thing to do is to remove the breast glands of young girls or at least remove them at the first sign of trouble without trying any alternative treatments first in order to preserve the breast(women, how do you like it now?). And for infections of all the organs, including female organs, use a new invention called antibiotics. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if “TRUE phimosis” occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.circinfo.org/alternatives.html
The foreskin can still be tight even after puberty, and it is natural, not TRUE phimosis.
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.

SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circumcised men will have to deal with discomfort and dry glans. Uncircumcised men, pull the foreskin back for a day, and see how it feels against your underwear all day, and see what happens. The frenulum is the G SPOT in men.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!

If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a BIG UPROAR about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parent’s decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him? It is the parent’s decision to choose the son religion? How can he chose a religion or his believes, if he is just a baby?
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html

2006-10-30 15:58:24 · answer #9 · answered by miniboi6666 2 · 0 1

nope

2006-10-30 13:17:53 · answer #10 · answered by T w 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers