First you must realize that the ball will hit the ground in the same time regardless of any horizontal force. So calculating the time to impact totally ignores any horizontal influence. On the other hand, WHERE it hits the ground has nothing to do with any vertical force such as gravity, except for the simple fact of determining exactly how long the ball is "in flight", which then enables you to calculate how far afield it will be when it hits. The previous answers very adequatly describe how this is done.
2006-10-30 12:47:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sciencenut 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
First, look at the vertical motion, and use the equation of motion that deals with uniform acceleration, like a falling ball:
d = vt + 1/2 at^2
where d is distance = 176.4 m
v = initial speed = 0 (assuming it is dropped, not thrown)
t= time = ?
a = acceleration = 9.8 m/s^2 in free fall on Earth
so
176.4 = 0 + 1/2(9.8)t^2
352.8 = 9.8t^2
36 = t^2
t = 6 seconds
So the ball falls for 6 seconds. How far does it move horizontally?
Use the formula F = ma
12 N = 3kg*a
a = 4 m/s^2
and use the first formula again
d = vt +1/2at^2
d = 0 + 1/2(4)(6)^2
d= 72 meters
2006-10-30 12:38:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by leapyearer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
in a physics question, you can easily simplify the problem by looking at only one axis at a time (the x- or y- axis) meaning horizontal or vertical
let's start with vertical:
the weight of the ball does not matter because everything falls at the same rate (acceleration of gravity)
you know the change in y (distance) is 176.4 m
you know the initial velocity is 0 m/s (it is dropped, not thrown)
you know the acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2
and you need to find the time
the equation you will use is
(change in y) = (intital velocity)(time) + (1/2)(acceleration)(time)^2
so plug in the numbers and find time, the easiest way to rearrange would be
time = [-(inital velocity) +/- [(initialvelocity)^2 + 4(- change in y)(1/2)(acceleration)]^(1/2)] / [2(1/2)(acceleration)]
through the equation
x = [-b +/- [(b^2) + 4ac]^(1/2)] / 2a
now the horizontal:
for the horizontal, you know the only force exerted on the ball is the wind
you will use the equation
sigma F = mA
i will put E instead of sigma to simplify things (sigma simply means the sum of)
so
EF = mA
12 = 3A
A = 4 m/s^2
(change in x) = (initial velocity)(time) + (1/2)(acceleration)(time)^2
simply plug in the numbers you have (inital velocity is zero and time is the same as in the vertical direction) to find the change in x, or the distance in the horizontal plane
2006-10-30 12:41:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by BabyFace 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
So my questions are: How do you assume me to easily turn around and initiate believing without information? rather, in case you study Heb 11:one million in countless translations, you will see that we do desire information. yet, the priority is that what constitutes information to one individual isn't inevitably information to a diverse. All some people desire is that this "scientist so-and-so suggested this and that" and all of the neverlutionists lie prostrate in worship at his words. Then there are Christians possibly that don't learn the subject concerns and picture that only believing while not having a commencing place is adequate - that too isn't a stable commencing place. understand this nevertheless - do you think that some small city next to Moscow which you have under no circumstances visited yet is on the map - exists? Why? Why do you compromise for his or her testimony? might desire to this recommend that there is a element while testimony from assorted solid people is adequate 'information' to believe some thing is actual? What approximately baseless assumptions? The assets you have, do they advance with time or advance previous and gets replaced? Do those ever take place of their own 'volition'? What does that say as to 'information' of evolution - neverlution - wisely phrased? So, certainly there is information and information. some people won't believe the testimony of thousands by way of fact that is not information, yet they certainly will believe that the main complicated organs, alongside with the techniques, all designed and made themselves! Incongruous for effective. information - you're saying, and yet gullibility exists, abounds everywhere, even between the 'notably' knowledgeable.
2016-10-16 13:44:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First you need to know the acceleration due to gravity which is 9.8 or 10 for easier equations. Using equations which you should really learn for physics problems, you get the time to be 6 seconds. Then if there is 12 N of force horizontally, then multiply it by the time in the air which is 6 seconds. Then you get 72 meters.
2006-10-30 12:37:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by PoisonMushroom 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
An object falling is accelerated by gravity at 9.81m/s^2. The formula for distance under constant acceleration is:
s = v1 + 1/2at^2
s = 176.4
v1 = initial velocity = 0
a = acceleration = 9.81
t = time
Solve for t. I'll let you do the work.
For horizontal distance:
f=ma
f = 12N
m = 3kg
a = acceleration
Substitute into:
s = v1 + 1/2at^2
v1 = 0
a = acceleration calculated above
t = time from above
Do the math, if I haven't forgotten anything since high school, you should get the correct answer.
EDIT: PoisonMushroom is treating the 12N as a constant speed. Your question indicates it is a force causing acceleration.
2006-10-30 12:38:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
1⤊
0⤋