Then take all the accolades for myself?
2006-10-30 12:16:16 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Not quite as moral as it would be for me to take your firearm and shoot you when you try.
2006-10-30 12:20:39 · answer #1 · answered by daydoom 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO-not from moral or ethical viewpoint for they would be committing a crime and taking something that does not belong to them to take and by using a gun they are also endangering your life or any other bystander in the area and although the money is then used to help unfortunates-doing good with iot does not justify how they got the money.One can argue that the politicians could still have helped the unfortunates by simply using their own money; if they lacked the money needed could have workd and earned the needed amount and also initiated drives,fundraisers and so on to raise the money needed. If after taking your money they then gave to the unfortunates with the claim that it is their own money or they earned or raised the money and they are praised for their good works then are guilty of deception and accpting praise and honors not theirs to take.
2016-05-22 13:27:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be moral and ethical if you were sentenced the 10 to twenty you would receive for robbery in the 1st degree with an enhancement of 5 years for introducing a weapon in the commission of a crime
2006-10-30 12:31:10 · answer #3 · answered by Bxrock 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is one of those idoit questions........Unless you have no morels you know the answer to that question...Now if you were raised without morels,then i will tell you this is wrong....I can however relate to your feelings because its very hard to see poor people struggle and the rich live like kings,it shameful to tell the truth..But you can,t do that! Most people that have money either work very hard,or inherit it..Im not rich and sometimes I have had thoughts of bitterness because I don,t have much ,but you just can,t justify that !
2006-10-30 14:36:06 · answer #4 · answered by slickcut 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The end does not justify the means. You can give a man a fish, and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish, and he eats for a lifetime. If you really care about the poor, you would volunteer to teach them skills or open programs for poor kids to stay in school, don't you think we have enough people whose only skill is pulling a trigger for a living?
2006-10-30 12:19:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
How can it be right to steal? And, just because some one has a couple dollars in his pocket doesn't make him rich, it just makes him able to buy dinner for his family.
2006-10-30 12:26:11 · answer #6 · answered by desert_kats 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is it moral or ethical for me to kick you in the balls so hard you can never have sex again in this or any other lifetime, and then laugh at you as you lay on the ground clutching at your smashed scrotum and gasping for breath?
2006-10-30 12:18:25 · answer #7 · answered by My Evil Twin 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Robin Hood! ask him...
more like immorale for stealing
2006-10-30 12:18:57 · answer #8 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Robin Hood never impressed me.
2006-10-30 12:18:50 · answer #9 · answered by MEL T 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
By jove, I think he's got it!
Maybe in France, not here!
2006-10-30 12:20:53 · answer #10 · answered by Ha! Invisible! 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋