English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What do you think about it? Always causing controversy, dumb move?
Is it influential to others to adopt overseas?
Is she trying to make amends for her past?
What?

2006-10-30 10:28:13 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Music

10 answers

She's just riding the adopt-a-foreign-child bus that Angelina Jolie is driving.

2006-10-30 10:35:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i have heard similar comments about Tina Turner and he or she is pushing 70. What else are those human beings meant to do? Be placed out to pasture and waste away something of their lives through boredom or save appearing as long as there is an target audience prepared to confirm them? i do not realize why there must be an age decrease for performers. as long as they could do it and human beings savor seeing them, then there's no reason they shouldn't proceed till the day they die. I even ought to admit that i imagine Madonna does seem quite undesirable and that is not because of her age. She needs to diminish decrease back on her workouts and stop notwithstanding she is injecting herself with because her hands and fingers seem freakishly muscular and veiny. She also seems to have had some undesirable beauty surgical operation lately because she has the function crooked puffy lips and wide cheekbones that were cropping on another older celebrities. It also sounds like she will't close her eyes good. in accordance with yet another submit, i do not fancy Sean Connery. the guy is amost 30 years older than i'm. i love him as an actor in spite of the indisputable fact that it does not recommend i want to have sex with him or actually have toddlers by technique of him. i'd want to teach that Kim Cattrall is considered particularly a sex image and he or she is over the age of fifty.

2016-12-05 09:23:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think Madonna adopting a child is great. Who's business is it anyways, if she wants to go and adopt 100 more children that is her own business. She has the money and that little boy will NEVER want for anything ever again in his life. What is so wrong with that.....

2006-10-30 10:37:12 · answer #3 · answered by sisinlovewithyou 4 · 0 0

Publicity stunt. No matter what she does she can't make amends for her past from what I've seen of it. If celebrities want to be helpful they should make a donation to an entire village, not just take one or two kids home and let the rest suffer. That's not helping, it's just a vulgar display of wealth and an excuse to use the kid as a tax break.

2006-10-30 10:33:23 · answer #4 · answered by infernal_seamonkey 4 · 0 2

Its a good thing. The child will have a better life.

2006-10-30 10:29:14 · answer #5 · answered by sasweet1 3 · 1 0

She wants the kind of attention that Angelina Jolie gets.

2006-10-30 10:30:24 · answer #6 · answered by Susie 6 · 2 2

Well if it was for publicity, it worked, your talking about it....bad attention is better than no attention

2006-10-30 10:32:26 · answer #7 · answered by nicole 6 · 0 0

i really think she is just trying to call attention to the poverty and crappy way of life in africa. and make more people care and want to help.

2006-10-30 10:30:42 · answer #8 · answered by Nora G 7 · 0 1

i don't know who is more dumb... her for adopting and having them grow up to see everything she did, or the father that said yes, then no b/c he didn't underdstand adoption....

2006-10-30 10:31:09 · answer #9 · answered by innocentkitty214 3 · 0 2

helpful

2006-10-30 10:30:45 · answer #10 · answered by EL President 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers