Communism is a lost cause, especially in the US. Believe whatever you want but it isnt going to get you anywhere.
2006-10-30 09:35:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by E 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Both.
It's all tied up in coporate greed.
However, the current system of representation is not equal, both in Congress and in the electoral college. These antiquated system makes us look medieval.
Why should the scant population of North Dakota or Montana have two senators like the huge populations of Florida or California. Apparently those people get more representation than others? And even the numbers in the house, where people in smaller states still have less people per rep, give them more power over individual reps from larger states.
Can someone give an actualy justification for this without doing some pointless citation from the constitution?
2006-11-02 03:28:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Composer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the two pander to the rich and not the midsection type as they might choose so you might have self assurance. The Republicans and Democrats are greater of a threat to the american way of life than Al Qaeda is, fact
2016-11-26 19:51:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kim Jong Ill is your man.
You would love it in North Korea. It is Socialist, and the Workers Paradise.
Many Democrats agree with you and would like to turn this into a Communist Nation.
Contact Nancy Pelosi.
I think that you'll find enough common ground that you can support the Democrat Party.
2006-10-30 09:37:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The poll of 1,021 adult Americans was conducted May 5-7 by Opinion Research Corp. for CNN. It had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Respondents favored Clinton by greater than 2-to-1 margins when asked who did a better job at handling the economy (63 percent Clinton, 26 percent Bush) and solving the problems of ordinary Americans (62 percent Clinton, 25 percent Bush).
On foreign affairs, the margin was 56 percent to 32 percent in Clinton's favor; on taxes, it was 51 percent to 35 percent for Clinton; and on handling natural disasters, it was 51 percent to 30 percent, also favoring Clinton.
Moreover, 59 percent said Bush has done more to divide the country, while only 27 percent said Clinton had.
When asked which man was more honest as president, poll respondents were more evenly divided, with the numbers -- 46 percent Clinton to 41 percent Bush -- falling within the poll's margin of error. The same was true for a question on handling national security: 46 percent said Clinton performed better; 42 percent picked Bush.
2006-10-30 09:35:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
They are two wings of the same vulture concentrating on wealth rather than issues. Socialism has it's good points which should be incorporated into the current system rather than replacing it. Fight from the inside.
2006-10-30 09:34:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sounds a lot like unions to me or socialism.
Our church has a name for your system & it has never worked on Earth. The Amish are the closest. I am not sharing what I earned while others were too lazy & having fun. I planned on fun for retirement & not giving it up now.
2006-10-30 09:40:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are the same thing and they both support the same master. As long as you believe that there is any difference between the two - then the powers have won.
FP
2006-10-30 09:43:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The only difference between Democrats and Republicans is how you like to be screwed!
2006-10-30 09:47:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
From my POV,it seems the Republicans are getting
a bad rep these days. Yet,I don't care for either of the
parties myself.
2006-10-30 09:59:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They both suck. But they implement all kinds of Socialism so you should like them. Did you know Marx and the Bolsheviks were financed by capitalist bankers?
2006-10-30 09:37:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋