I agree that there is a dangerous epidemic of unwarranted self-esteem in this nation, but I wouldn't blame Mr. Rogers. Unfortunately, parents and the school systems feed "You're Great!" and "You're Awesome" into these kids heads all day long. It doesn't matter if they're a disrespectful, lying, disobedient, bullying little creep--they're going to hear "You're the BEST!!!" about 100 times a day.
2006-10-30 09:25:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jess H 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
In the publication, Hermione is dressed in a blue get dressed for the complete dance. However, within the films, for a few cause or an additional, they positioned her right into a red get dressed. I'm assuming that is wherein the confusion is available in. Also, Harry did not admire her to start with due to the fact that she appeared very exclusive. She had performed her hair up into a complicated kind, and it was once not hairy and loopy. Additionally, he had in no way obvious her put on a get dressed earlier than, or whatever fancy of the variety. Also, he more often than not in no way suspected that Hermione might cross with Viktor, so it was once unforeseen. I consider I might like Care of Magical Creatures or Charms the exceptional. I'm no longer certain what career I might have within the wizarding international. We simplest get to peer so few jobs, that it is difficult to understand what all is in the market. I consider of the Weasley's, rather then Ginny and Ron, Fred and George more often than not knew Harry exceptional. Although Molly did say she regarded Harry as a son.
2016-09-01 04:51:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think you can blame Mr Rogers for anyones "unwarrented self esteem".
2006-10-30 09:47:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Paul K 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Mr Rogers has nothing to answer for. He served his time in the service at Iwo Jima and in later life tried to have a good clean children's program to teach children to be proud of who they are. What's so bad about that?
2006-10-30 09:36:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by ♥cinnamonmj♥ 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think this question is ludicrous. With all of the evil role models out there, to pick on someone who did nothing but good is disingenuous at worst and asinine at best. Fred Rogers did no harm to anyone. His outlook on life was simplistic, being from a few generations back, but to besmirch his reputation after his death no less strikes me as cruel and cowardly.
2006-10-30 09:29:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Remember "Mr. Robinson's Neighborhood?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Live_TV_show_sketches#Mister_Robinson.27s_Neighborhood
2006-10-30 09:28:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Zarco 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Don't blame it on that sweet kind man. Blame it on our schools that have watered down the curriculum to the point where any imbecile can make A's. Blame it on school boards who brow beat teachers who fail students. Blame it on parents whose children can do no wrong and who have no time to be parents. Their kids can do drugs, have sex, and ditch school but they are still their little angels. Oh, and blame TV, movies and video games that feed kids a steady diet of sex and violence. These are the ones who deserve blame and have ruined our kids.
2006-10-30 09:35:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by notyou311 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
I think you have an unhealthy obsession with Mr. Rogers. Leave the poor guy alone, he's dead.
2006-10-30 09:30:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by mei-lin 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
He was Mr. Rogers for Christ sake. I do not think his intent was bad. I wouldn't let my daughter watch his program when she was little because I just think he is kinda odd and weird and probably a pedophile. I compare him to Michael Jackson and that should say enough.
2006-10-30 09:31:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Maggie 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
Oh, was I suppose to take him literally. I just liked the lady Elaine with her sassy attitude, oh yes and the way stuff was made.
/doc
2006-10-30 09:26:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋