Bush's "policy" on Global Warming is Let's Wait and See. Is this an intelligent approach?

Question

Or is it like, when your house has caught fire, saying let's not call anybody and see if the firetrucks come by themselves?

Answer 1

No, if we wait too long then the effects will be irreversible.

I think he sees it as an economic gain because the Arctic sea will become a new rout for sea travel and shipping. He will probably want a port city in northern Alaska to be named Bushington (or Bush-Land for that matter!).

And to Speedfreak:
Are you aware that scientists agree that this century would not be that natural time for this type of worming event to occur? Are you aware that 62% of the polluting in the world that is leading to global warming was produced here in the US? What is China doing? They are building the largest hydro-electric dam in the world to try and shift their growing dependence on coal and oil. Are you aware that Brazil is one of the biggest reasons for the stemming problems due to the destruction and in some cases burning of the rain forest that is not only taking away a natural filterer of carbon dioxide and with the case of burning the trees that they cut down releasing the carbon stored within them?
Are you aware that the coil and oil that we are constantly burning is a natural substance that in nature's grand plan was supposed to stay locked within the earth?

Answer 2

I believe that global warming IS a problem. But even if it's NOT a problem, does it hurt us to try to clean up the atmosphere? Would it destroy the auto industry if their cars had to get 2 MPG better? Does anyone really NEED a Hummer? How many SUVs do you suppose have ever actually been off of a paved surface?

Bush's reluctance to do anything is because anything he does might have a financial impact on the oil industry. So he does nothing. It's like the house is burning down, but as long as he has marshmallows to toast, he's not going to call the fire department.

Answer 3

It is intelligent. We know for certain that temperatures in the world were both much higher in history (colonisaion of Greenland by Vikings, wheat farming there) and much colder (completely frozen Baltic sea in the winters of 1600's). These facts are from excavations- and are _facts_ and not sponsored made-to-order-research.

And even if Bush did believe in the global warming scam- what would it change when China is exempt from the Kyoto treaty and has increased coal fired power plants by 8 times in 10 years? They also claim to have lower CO2 emission than 10 years back- its magic coal you see. The more you burn, the less pollution it makes. On paper.

Global warming might be a scam, but pollution we can sure do without.

Answer 4

good Ten regulations had to confirm a worldwide Apocalypse Following are the main pressing coverage prescriptions had to maximise the probability of a collapsed worldwide atmosphere. they are listed so as of value. To have any risk of hastening the tip we actually would desire to get at it. No. a million - inhabitants - Human inhabitants isn't appropriate to our modern-day subject. we are able to make as a lot of human beings as we want and there'll be no consequence. Human ingenuity can remedy any attainable subject. whilst we run out of room right here we are able to colonize the Moon, then Mars, then the entire Universe! No. 2 - GREENHOUSE GASES – worldwide Warming is the main suitable hoax ever perpetrated. The Environmentalist / Socialist / Secular Humanist Axis of Evil would desire to be destroyed in any respect value. No. 3 - shelter ECOSYSTEMS? –Nature will regenerate itself ad infinitum no remember what we do. a great style of the stuff we do is larger than nature besides. No. 4 - intake – we've a God given financial precise to consume what we want. era. I worked complicated for my money and that i’ll spend it as I please. No. 5 - AGRICULTURE - God gave us dominion over the earth. that's ours to apply as we see in good shape. we are able to tinker with the genes of our foodstuff, and heck with each thing else for that remember. whilst all it is left is eco-friendly slime, as long as that's nutritious and tastes stable, who cares! No. 6 - ECONOMIES - Markets are the purest type of organic regulation. enable the cream upward thrust to the best and enable the rest consume cake. No. 7 - technologies - technologies is the Holy Grail. via God, what guy would ever desire to stick his hand down into the grimy Earth, the stinky slimy Sea. the tip state of humanity could be to stay in a hermetically sealed bubble with all his needs and desires artificially supplied. No. 8 - ECOLOGICAL fix? – We already provide up too plenty to the crazed hippy environmentalists. we've a God Given precise to take the final 2% of international that hasn't been spoiled and make some greater money off it. whilst Antarctica unfreezes, i desire first dibs there too. No. 9 - POVERTY- detrimental rather everyone seems to be lazy and deserve their lot. No. 10 – DEMILITARIZATION? - If i will’t defraud you out of what you have, I’ll make regulations that make cheating you out of it criminal. And whilst that fails I’ll in basic terms kill you and take it.

Answer 5

Sure. You are aware that we have had several warming and cooling trends over the last few thousand years, right? You are aware that the polar ice cap has advanced and receded many times over in the last few hundred thousand years, are you not?

Maybe you should give China, India, and the former Soviet Republics a call to see what they are going to do to stem their enormous tide of pollution resulting from their emergence among the leaders of the world's industrialized nations.

Give Putin a call and see what he tells you. You are not focusing on the right people oh naive one.

Answer 6

No, that is not his policy. Our Federal Government's policies concerning environmental science, energy and pollution would fill a large hard drive, and are far beyond the comprehension of most, let alone such a clumsy attempt at exegesis. Your question was basically a rewording of the old "when did you stop beating your wife" fallacy. It assumes so many things not in real evidence as to be useless and unanswerable.

Answer 7

I think he is just being tactful as one would be toward small children and the mentally impaired. When what he he really wants is to tell the the green weenies is to kiss his @ss.

Watch this euopean "envirnmental tax" that is coming around. England is dealing with it now, if you want to look it up. See it for what it is. It is the UN's first real chance to levy a global tax so they can legitamately redistribute our wealth in a more open way.

We could be just one election away...

Answer 8

He takes solace from the fools here that believe that Global warming is just a talking head.

Answer 9

Global Warming is a hoax by people with an agenda. An agenda to make money from the gullible.
Talk is cheap.
I'll bet you have never planted a tree.

Answer 10

I guess that it is kinda a good approach, since global warming might not even be real. There is proof that it is real, however there is proof that it isn't real, and that it's just a natural cycle of the earth. So it is good not to jump to conclusions and waste money trying to stop something that might not even be a danger or even real.