English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Because it is a defenseless act.

2006-10-30 09:06:02 · answer #1 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 0 4

which mass killings of babies? If you are referring to abortions, that is your opinion and others do not share it. Some do but some do not. In my opinion this is not murder. When aborting a fetus it is just that a fetus. There is no soul so no murder is being committed. If after a child is born and is killed by whomever, that sir, is when murder is committed Oh, by the way, I am Canadian and have no political affiliation.

2006-10-30 09:19:50 · answer #2 · answered by J. A. M. 4 · 0 0

I'll bet not all abortions are by liberals. The point is that many of these children will suffer through bad lives. If you are worried about their souls, they are not of the age of understanding, so they go to heaven. If an abortion stops one from a bad life I say go for it. If you conservatives feel so strongly, work with teen moms to help them raise their kids. Work for stronger child support laws. Put dead beat dads to work and make them pay. Make crack and drunk women clean up and take care of their kids. Work to stop child abuse. Do all these things and leave women to make their own decisions. If there is a judgement day all sinners will have to stand alone and pay. So, help to make the world a better place instead of complaining about others. God Bless!!!

I ask you why do conservatives condone mass killings of civilians in the name of national security?

2006-10-30 09:14:13 · answer #3 · answered by doggiebike 5 · 0 1

Liberals don't kill babies. They believe in laws that allow each person to make their own decision about whether a fetus is a baby and the circumstances under which the life of a fetus may be terminated. Personally, I'm not in favor of abortion, but I believe in the right for people to make their own decision, up to a point.

Just curious, do you believe that conservatives believe in killing people because they oppose gun control laws?

2006-10-30 09:11:53 · answer #4 · answered by bb80266 3 · 0 1

My goodness! There was a mass killing of babies? You couldn't possibly be referring to individual women choosing abortions, as defensible by law, because those are individual decisions, and I don't think that being liberal or conservative is a prerequisite. If you know of a mass killing, I think you are morally obligated to report it to the legal authorities in the locale where it took place. God bless you.

2006-10-30 09:12:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

They don't see them as life.Kind of like Japanese soldiers did in WW2.They saw us as sub-human;making it O.K for them to kill us without guilt.
Someone up there said something about it being legal.Slavery was legal too.A republican president(Lincoln-for you public school victims)had to stop the oppression.He had to drag killers into a new age...kicking and screaming all the way.

2006-10-30 09:16:36 · answer #6 · answered by STIFLE IT LIBS 1 3 · 0 0

well... scientists have discovered a means to see the child's eventual political following, so, the liberals are killing off the conservatives to be, thus ruling the world!!!


actually... read up on the issues before making yahoo questions... you'll be able to ask a more, how would you say... intellectual question.

2006-10-30 09:10:25 · answer #7 · answered by bl00dsuckr 3 · 0 1

They say it's not a "baby", it's a "mass" or an "embryo" or a "fetus", or "contents of the womb." Why is it that they get offended at pictures of aborted babies, they say it's too stressful...they just won't admit that abortion is killing babies. I don't understand their morbid desire to do this.

2006-10-30 09:08:42 · answer #8 · answered by sacolunga 5 · 2 1

It's interesting that you condemn the use of embryonic stem cells and call it the killing of children when you can support the wholesale slaughter of our sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, husband and fathers in this lie induced hell that George has perpetuated in Iraq. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

2006-10-30 09:34:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I was unaware there had been a mass killing of babies. I assume you are referring to abortion and the removal of a group of cells that have yet to form into any recognizable being that would be incapable of living on it's own.

2006-10-30 09:07:51 · answer #10 · answered by misskate12001 6 · 1 3

What? You mean abortion? People who are for abortion don't see them as babies, so technically they can't kill them. Hence they see no reason to defend it.

2006-10-30 09:08:45 · answer #11 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers