Legally, Morally and Ethically? YES, but William is the better choice.
2006-10-30 11:14:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
EEW! Who would want a big cheater to be the king? I know that he wouldn't be taken seriously. I know he won't last 20 years in throne. I know he would get the nick name, Charles the great cheater. He jsut cheated and cheated on Diana, who is the better one and the prettier one and the rightful one, until she gets really pissed and separates with Charles! oh and by the way his gold digger new wife, Camilla, will do anything just to stop Charles from handing over the crown to William so she can enjoy the life of wearing really nice jewels whenever she wants. And who would want her as queen? So in conclusion, I don't want him to be king.
2006-10-30 12:13:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
From Calif. : Charles is as good as any other you have.I mean he's just a figurehead anyway ,right?He seems to have pulled his act together over the years.Now that he's with someone he really cares about,he should do fine.His Mom needs to step down and give the guy a break.She seems to want to Micro- Manage his life.Being of English stock(Gramps came over in 1850)I keep an eye on Britain.
2006-10-30 11:50:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by AngelsFan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Too Late for Charles, I think a lot of people like him but have lost respect for him over the way Princess Diana was treated,
I really don't think that he would be taken seriously,
He should hand the title straight to William as soon as he is mature enough to handle it.
People would accept William as the King of England and I think He would give the royal family the boost they need.
People tend to lay some blame on Charles for the death of Diana and I think as if Charles Gives up his right to become king so as to let "Dianas son" William become King then I think this would slighlty even the score as they can see Diana in William.
2006-10-30 08:57:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by jabelite 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes. It is his birth right. You can say all you want about morals and such about him but first: look at ALL monach history....has very many of them been totally and completely moral and everything? no. In fact, there have been much much worse ones....Ivan the terrible, Henry VIII for example.
And second, I think Charles has gotton a raw deal from alot of people simply because he is alive. Not to dump on the Princess of Wales, but the cheating, the lies the mind games between the two of them....IT TAKES TWO!!
it always does take two.
Dianna just is seen in better light because she is the "immortal People's Princess"
2006-10-30 11:36:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Count DiMera 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
NO. make william king.anyway why should charles be able to be made King when previous royal members were abdicated from the throne for marrying a divorcee. I'm on the throne every morning but that doesn't make me King
2006-10-30 10:35:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by monkeyboy 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
No the big eared prat with his ugly adulterous wife and his ability to speak fluent daffodil is a total Cambridge (A55) would be barely acceptable as a dustman let alone as king.
2006-10-30 14:04:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by "Call me Dave" 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes..he is the only one who has the credentials...we may have a bad system of government but look at the others around the world....stability and the establishment have a lot going for them...Charles is not the fool he is painted ....(any complete bollicks can be a critic...look at some of these answers,,!!)...he will do OK.
2006-10-30 09:01:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by notgnal 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Of course he'll make a good king. Its all about public engagements and sordid secrets. He can't be a bad king, he is told what to wear, where to go and what to say!
However, I think you should have asked "why have a monarchy?"
Up the republic!
2006-10-30 09:11:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Debbie Mc 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Definately NOT He was divorced and married a divorcee.
Prince William is the man to have as King,a true gentleman.
2006-10-30 09:15:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Andyp P 2
·
0⤊
2⤋