Spanking of children as discipline.
I mean just spanking, not whiping, punching, or belts
the last survery I did was on the death penatly
For 23
Against 11
Undecided 0
I don't know wtf they meant 2
2006-10-30 08:25:19 · 29 answers · asked by ♥Gïrl¥♥ 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
You spank with your hand Sexpert.
2006-10-30 08:32:52 · update #1
for. thats why god made butts soft. and padded. and it should only be once. and it doesnt have to be that hard. just getting spanked and a lil lecture should do the trick. at least it does for my two kids.
2006-10-30 08:29:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well I am against ....not to say that I haven't spanked....But don't ever do it to get your anger out. I like to step back...and look at the situation. Does it really need that type of punishment? 9/10 times the answer is no. I think the older they get.....they less punishments like that is needed. And never ever too young. I knew a girl who would spank her 7 month old if he wouldn't stop crying....talk about your dumb ideas.
Oh yeah and spanking is never a good punishment for hitting.
My answer is undecided.....because that is how I feel right now.
2006-10-30 08:43:32 · answer #2 · answered by })i({ J and D's Momma })i({ 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think its up to the parent personally im against it, my child if I had any would be brought up to know if I so much as look at them in a way they had better stop. I would use blackmail or an incentive for them to be good.
2006-10-30 08:39:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dragon is for. But spanking only by parents, and only with a hand.
2006-10-30 08:27:54 · answer #4 · answered by VLIGER DRAGÖN 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
FOR!!!!!
may I vote more than once?
re-read the question - how does one spank without a belt?
2006-10-30 08:27:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
For, some children needs firm discipline
2006-10-30 08:30:21 · answer #6 · answered by ♥♥Bree♥♥ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For, in case you probably did the crime you may want to do the time, and if which skill sentenced to lack of existence then so be it. a lot more cost-efficient than housing and feeding a convicted killer for something of their organic existence.
2016-12-05 09:17:49 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For
2006-10-30 09:04:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
For
2006-10-30 08:27:10 · answer #9 · answered by Jet 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
For
2006-10-30 08:27:26 · answer #10 · answered by icddppl 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋