English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bowling or Batting?????

2006-10-30 06:50:09 · 32 answers · asked by Sandeep S 1 in Sports Cricket

32 answers

it was not a big target by us,so the bowlers should be in their nick with perfect length and line .the dudes just gave them a practice session ,b4 the real match began .aussies are demon hitters ,if you dont know to content them ,then better choose to loose the match.i think thats what the bowlers did.

2006-10-30 22:46:52 · answer #1 · answered by ram 1 · 0 0

I cant understand why any one would blame the bowling. We clearly lack the pace and Harbhajan cant be a one man team. Lately all wins of india have been because of his precise and economical bowling. We cant always expect him to perform. He is entitled to an off form day once a while. Now having said this, one must definitely expect the batting to come though which has gone downhill after chappel took over. In nutshell following are reasons for debacle

1) Chappel. Get rid of these phirangis yaar. we have enough cricketers who can coach the team. For the life of it I cant understand why we need a phirangi coach. At the worst we should get a bowling coach
2) Dravid is a good player but a bad captain. He is just a slave of Chappel. He should have got Dhoni and Pathan ahead of Raina ( who i cant understand why we picked)
3)The batsmen who are routinely failing. Sehvag and kaif have only been scoring a few runs have a decent score once in on 20 matches. Thats not enough. Consistency is horrible.

Finally i think that Indians do a great job chasing the scores. While dew was expected in mohali, i still feel that they should have batted second. Some how I feel that its a shanme when we dont even know how our pitches will behave.

2006-10-30 11:21:47 · answer #2 · answered by King 4 · 0 0

Selection of final 11, batting order, failure to accelerate the score after 30 or 35 overs and erratic bowling. All these factors were the reasons for India's loss against Australia

2006-10-30 17:36:41 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

well, first of all india after winning the toss and getting off to a flyer...did not maintain their runrate in the middle overs therefore they were many runs short of what would have been a decent total...furthermore, india failed to capitalize on their bowling as they let australia score over 100 in the first 14 overs. After that their was a poor fielding display and a couple of dropped catches.
India went in with 7 batsman...which would have been ok had they chose to bowl first...they should have picked 5 specialist bowlers instead of 4 if they knew they will be defending a total...
OR
maybe winning the toss and batting first was a bad idea

2006-10-30 08:13:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Australia, is much greater team than Team India in all departments, over all kind of pitches b'coz they have consistency over their performance. Both the departments Batting and Bowling of Team India r patthetic, useless, the new players r lost and the old players r now on their way out but lingering on b'coz of the hype created on them, they have lots of stake in their endorsement, running over crores of ruppees so they stick on the team, last but not the least the coach is not an Indian i really don't understand y no former indian cricket players become coach- the west indies, australia, have an explayer to coach the team and they win matches.

2006-10-30 22:02:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i will answer your question with one in all my own. Why can some worldwide places and their captains not admit that they've been crushed via a greater advantageous section on the day? Shane Watson seems to be 'in the zone' this sequence so a techniques. I only wish he can stay there till after the Grand very final and the Australians have yet yet another trophy in the cabinet. incredibly on your question nevertheless, there replace into not adequate rain to reason a help in overs, as a result you won't be able to declare a rain postpone for the loss, so, no i don't accept as true with Dhoni.

2016-10-16 13:29:18 · answer #6 · answered by sachiko 4 · 0 0

Team spirit. Its what lacking.Dravid can be a good batsmen. He is not a good leader. He is struggling to come out of ganguly's shadow.He wants to show he is a leader at every time, Its not the case with ganguly. He built the team, he brought the people into the team. He has the cunning ability to mould the player. Dravid looks lost and he doesnt have that ability to handle the passion what ganguly passed on. He even lost the team which was built by ganguly. I think he is alone in the team along with greg. Everybody looks like an island.

2006-10-30 07:20:01 · answer #7 · answered by iitsmee20003 1 · 0 0

I think India lost bcoz of poor batting performance at the closing stage of first innings.And one more thing is India should bowled first, bcoz they are good run chasers.

2006-10-30 18:51:40 · answer #8 · answered by ZULU 1 · 0 0

Batting- They failed to capitalize after a good start by Sehwag,Not building partnerships etc. At start, I thought India would end up putting 270
Bowling- Failed to contain the aussies and take wickets

2006-10-30 17:44:40 · answer #9 · answered by Shashank Bekham 2 · 0 0

Greg Chappell

2006-10-30 07:03:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers