2006-10-30 05:27:00 · 12 answers · asked by whydoyoureportloser 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
absolutely
2006-10-30 05:32:00 · answer #1 · answered by REPUBLICAN MUD PACKER 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
to respond to the important question without regard to the "rates": the in basic terms way is to easily stay WITH want. I want ice cream right this moment yet its not good for me to have it right this moment so i do not. this does not make m y existence a lie and dropping each and every thing to go purchase a pint of Haagen Daas does not placed me on the rocket to Buddhatown, both. I have my personal concepts about that old saying, it really is became coined because particular human beings determined that we lived in a time that became too degraded for persons to toughen to an enlightened state. this does not recommend everyone might want to take the rocket or that the rocket is for everyone. i'm chop up in this the following "quote".I trust maximum of it because it describes and advocates a center way, a moderation, particularly than a mad rush to each and every thing that gives you excitement. The quote has type of a grafted experience, like 2 different concepts from 2 different places were prepare. The parts about the lotus flower and the scepter is in basic terms mediocre poerty and it quite says not something in any respect. Take the flowers from the bouquet and what do you've? something of the "rates" like I suggested I trust yet i do not comprehend how they pick the important question. i assume to each and each and every their own yet this finished sex for instant capacity component in basic terms leaves me at a loss for words as to what all of it has to do with any religious concepts. possibly the Bon of Tibet yet i do not comprehend adequate about it yet.
2016-12-05 09:10:10 · answer #2 · answered by forester 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. But there are a lot of oppressed people in general who go the "conservative" route to "proove" something.Enough to make people ask!
Repression is sad.
2006-10-30 05:33:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do you hate homosexuals? Aren't you part of the party of inclusion? Why would you think that calling someone a homosexual is a slur anyway?
2006-10-30 09:08:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question. I mean Bush and Blair, do seem to have a Clinton/lewinsky-esque relationship going on. The moral of the story is never get too close to a bush, it'll be your downfall for sure!
2006-10-30 05:32:53 · answer #5 · answered by Super Sarzi 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ahhhh yet another left wing loon that can't take a stand on an issue, cause he doesn't understand any ot them LOL so he spreads his left wing loon hate in an attempt to cover his ignorance :)
2006-10-30 05:34:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not just conservative men...all people do!
2006-10-30 05:30:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't think they repress it at all.
2006-10-30 05:32:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
STRANGE, AND IT IS U liberals THAT ACCUSE CONSERVATIVES OF GAY BASHING AND YOU WELCOME ALL PEOPLE INTO YOUR PARTY? WATCH OUT THERE FELLA YOU ARE SHOWING YOUR TRUE STRIPES
2006-10-30 06:22:26 · answer #9 · answered by sooj 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think I have heard it said that you would be what is considered, "projecting."
2006-10-30 05:30:54 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋