Most televisions, specially if made after 2000, have parental controls that can be utilized to block content that don't wish their kids to see? Or instead of using this technology they rather complain and have the shows censored?
2006-10-30 05:18:40 · 11 answers · asked by Sleazy P. Martini 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
They are liberal. Liberals don't work. People who don't work are poor. Poor people can't afford good TVs.
2006-10-30 05:21:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Haven't you heard? TVs make the best babysitters. As long as the kid has access to EVERYTHING on the tube, why bother complaining? It's more work for these parents to set the controls. Easier to hand the remote to the kids.
2006-10-30 09:14:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberal or conservatives, people in America have become stupid. Money for education have been cut for war. Technologies now belong to foreign countries and we are only trying to catch up.
Besides, I do believe that it was a small bunch of conservatives christian group who complained about wardrobe malfunction and the Desperate Housewives promotion.
2006-10-30 05:25:29 · answer #3 · answered by This Is Not Honor 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
TIVO. The best 5 bucks a month our family ever spent.
However, I would like to point out Good Morning America. Lately , just when you think it is okay to have it on in the morning, they have been showing promos for their evening shows. One day this included the "secret lives of strippers" or something of that nature. Commercials and morning shows should be more careful, imo.
2006-10-30 05:28:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the mothers and fathers are the priority not the infants, by way of fact they lack the skills or awareness of the persons incapacity, so as that they are embarrassed and uncomfortable in conversing approximately somebody who possibly slightly diverse, that's by way of their not having been uncovered to those with disabilities or who seem diverse as a baby. i replace into raised with a baby with CP, and family buddy had a baby with Down syndrome, yet those infants infrequently ventured outdoors, did not attend college or different family applications, this transformation into in the early 60's. infants are inquisitive and ask questions each and every of the time, some are straightforward to respond to some choose slightly careful explaining, and confident some questions make us (mothers and fathers/adults) squirm. infants tend to be greater accepting of a persons' difference or incapacity in the event that they are instructed in open and honest way. Carrie Burnell is a techniques from frightening, she seems established in each and every way, different than she is lacking he appropriate arm. those small minded people who think of should not be on T.V, might desire to as you're saying "manage it". And if their infants desire to be attentive to why she is lacking her arm, only tell them that Carrie replace into born along with her arm lacking, which happens some cases. practise is the foremost here, the greater people see those with disabilities in the community, on T.V & in merchandising, people may well be slightly greater accepting. What i locate incredible is, we see a "established baby" with bare feet, grimy with a snotty nostril, and infrequently anybody comments, see a baby with a incapacity with bare feet and a snotty nostril, there is assorted rude comments approximately how "its disgraceful that folk like that are allowed out". I even have seen and heard this suggested on many events. for this reason a lot of my clientele mothers and fathers/carers make effective their baby is scrupulously sparkling and immaculately dressed.
2016-10-16 13:25:31 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even with the controls, everything can't be blocked. What's wrong with some decency? The filth should be on certain adult channels only.
2006-10-30 05:24:09 · answer #6 · answered by jenjen 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some parents blaim everyone but themselves.
2006-10-30 05:24:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Thats great
2006-10-30 05:24:48 · answer #8 · answered by Uhookah2 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes and your point is what? i think you have some issues with children don't you? you a nambla fan? why are you concerned in your previous questions about the age of consent and now this?
2006-10-30 05:21:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
hmmm i don't recall hearing these same parents complain when saturday night live first aired...
2006-10-30 05:21:48 · answer #10 · answered by boots 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋