At least here in Brazil, it's pretty ordinary to hear some one saying that "nada se cria, tudo se copia" - i.e.: nothing is created, everything is copied".
I support that there are things which are originally invented. In fact, I maintain that this inventions are the "a priori" thing for the copies. And I have examples for that.
The today "you-tube" Google propriety. Before the two guys, this thing did not exist in the world. After they created, it took place and then othes copied them. But firsty it had to be invented.
What do you think? Am I not right?
Ie
2006-10-30 02:41:36 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
There is only one "creator". The one that created expresses to us that if you really think about it, there is nothing new to "create". You can only "discover" or "invent" from things that were "created". So what about "original" things? Still, all things seen and unseen came from one origin. I believe God will not say, mine is the "original" because God is the "origin" of all.
2006-10-30 03:08:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think it means that inventions are inspired by things that occur in nature.
2006-10-30 10:50:01 · answer #2 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
iKarod is absoulutly correct!!!!!!!!!!
2006-10-30 11:12:34 · answer #3 · answered by stargazer 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋