Why AGARKAR was not replaced when his bowling finger was injured in the last over during CLIFF HANGER with WEST INDIES at AHMEDABAD?
2006-10-30 01:20:58 · 7 answers · asked by MANOJ J 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Cuz no one is bowling good except Agarkar and Munaf but Munaf is not on the feild at that time so Agarkar bowled last over
2006-10-30 02:04:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agreewith nick less and also munaf was more seriously injured as compaed to agarkar and pathan bowled the second last over.
lso bhaji was over . Now there were just two good options with dravid the experienced Agarkar and of course the foolish R P Singh.Take u r pick
2006-10-30 01:37:04 · answer #2 · answered by snicker34 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The last over was entrusted to Agarkar as Munaf Patel was injured and considering his vast experience, Agarkar was considered as a better choice. Since Agarkar was not injured in the last over he bowled to the extent that he could not complete his over, it was not possible to replace him in the midst of the over.. As per rules, a bowler can be changed in the midst of over only if he is unable to complete his over due to injury.
2006-10-30 02:57:22 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they did not replaced Ajit Agarkar in the last over because it was no use....and the match really was ending with a west indies win..!!!!
2006-10-30 01:30:21 · answer #4 · answered by nickless 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he took alot of paise das y agarkar bowl dat bad .
2006-10-30 08:43:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he is going to be fit till the tour
2006-10-30 17:13:43 · answer #6 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for game loss.
2006-10-30 01:52:13 · answer #7 · answered by Shameem 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋