2006-10-30 01:17:48 · 18 answers · asked by Idonta Feelwell M.D. 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Uh babies cry and whine and cost money, with animals if you dont like them you can give them away.
2006-10-30 01:42:00 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think abortions of poor, defenseless animals is worse, because it serves no purpose. At least with animal testing, medical advances are made.
So I am against abortions of poor, defenseless animals.
Love Jack
2006-10-30 01:31:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both are very sad, but I am a human so I have to say it is sadder to know that SOME women use abortions as birth control. Allthough I don't think abortion should be banned completely, it is being very abused. Do you know if you use any products tested on animals? Unless you research everything you use, I can guarantee you have at least one in your life use a product tested on animals. Examples
Any medicane you have taken was tested on an animal, ever taken a tylenol? Antibiotics? ALL animal tested
2006-10-30 01:22:17 · answer #3 · answered by Star 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would depend on at what stage the abortion took place. Everyone agrees that late stage abortion is wrong unless it is to protect the life of the mother. Sometimes people get carried away as to when life starts, certainly God himself lets a lot of sperm cells die. People who are well out of the womb also die when overpopulation occurs. We should try to improve the quality of people with genetics-if you make them smarter they may not be so blindly led by the phony republicans whose only real interest is enriching themselves.
2006-10-30 01:26:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
While i t hink that abortion is wrong I do have a different opinion on animal testing because we are superior over animals and products and medicine need to tested on animals before it is delivered to humans to see what type of reactions there will be. Yes it is sad but it has to be done.
2006-10-30 01:23:01 · answer #5 · answered by Darcee 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
medical testing on poor defenseless animals..
2006-10-30 01:25:43 · answer #6 · answered by Electric 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Abortions, of course.
Medical testing on animals is necessary. People who don't believe in it should refrain from using any medicine or procedure that was developed with animals. So, too, should their children.
Does your healthplan cover witch-doctors, herbalists and shamans?
2006-10-30 02:01:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Human life is more sacred than animals life, animals can be breeded in ideal farms and can be made to populate, but a human being aborted is like killing a soul which we can never create.
2006-10-30 01:21:13 · answer #8 · answered by Syed M 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither. One is a personal decision between a woman and her doctor WITHOUT GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE and the other saves millions of lives by bringing new drugs onto the market to save people who are a whole lot more important than white mice.
2006-10-30 01:20:47 · answer #9 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Forcing anyone to endure having to listen to Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter or any of the right wing nutjobs is far worse than either.
2006-10-30 01:20:55 · answer #10 · answered by brian2412 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The fact that you weren't aborted is abhorrent.
2006-10-30 01:21:29 · answer #11 · answered by SatanicYoda 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋