I think, and this is just my personal opinion, that evolution has more proof and it makes more sense. Creation is a religious belief and it has no more justification than any other religious explanation. Evolution has scientific proof, such as fossils or carbon dating. But im also a firm believer in that people can believe what they feel is right so long as it doesn't affect of harm other people.
2006-10-29 13:56:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shifter 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is no evolution vs. creation, except in the minds of the ignorant. We can see evolution. Ever seen creation? If you mean evolution by natural selection; it is supported by mountains of evidence, from disciplines as variant as geology to molecular biology. It has great predictive power, as witnessed by it's correct positing of the age of the earth, vs. the age posited by Lord Kelvin. Creationism; is the reveled word of someone who has not submitted a stick of evidence. A creationist could not predict next Tuesday. Look at how many times these zealots have predicted the end of the world; wrongly.
PS. IT does not matter what I believe, the truth does not care about my beliefs, and something can be true, whether I believe in it , or not.
2006-10-29 21:59:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have plenty of evidence for evolution.
To take creation for granted, is also termed as "religion".
However, some might look for scientific evidence of any intelligent design !
The truth is that human knowledge as up to now is still limited and very much uncertain. This does not automatically authorise us to believe, because we want to !
Recent evidence suggests we might live in part of a Multi-verse, we call our universe. Our universe itself might have been the result of a pulsating big bang. Pulsating means, we are in the expansion mode now - ultimately, the initial force of big bang will be exhausted and everything in our universe will collapse back into a pot . . . ready for another big bang.
To make matters more interesting, our rate of expansion does not match the volume of matter around us, hence suggestion of dark matter and dark energy around us - that our science and technology can not detect !
So, while evolution is an inevitable path, creation needs a lot more proof and validation to succeed, and a dogmatic approach to deny evolution does not help the cause of creation. Just as well, for believers of evolution, judging intelligent design as mambo jumbo does not promote the scientific quest for our origin !
2006-10-29 22:40:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by tekno_alan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution is not "vs." Creation. Evolution is a post-Creation biological process. Obviously things cannot change (evolve) until they exist!
2006-10-29 23:39:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by PaulCyp 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution vs Creation ? I agree completely. One is in complete opposition to the other. There can be no disagreement about that. Now what do you want to know about one or the other ?
2006-10-29 22:03:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Could the order of Creation as written down in the Genesis account be written any different to sustain life on Earth. 1. Light / 2. Producers 3 Animals (Herbivores, Carni and Omnivores) / 4. Man. Maybe the author of Genesis (Moses) could have guessed this scientific order, maybe not. Lets say he guessed it. Take 7 numbers in a hat, mix em up, then take them out one by one in correct order. Bet u ,you will have one difficult task. OK check out Moses educational level, didnt have a Phd from College of Cairo in Egypt. So God told him this is what happened, and you write it down. Fossil record is complete. Bigbang theory is nonsense, cant create order as on earth,by an explosion, explosions create disorder Have not seen/ no record of any ape turning human yet
2006-10-30 11:06:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by quinton p 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Evolution is explained by science and is, therefore, truth. Creation is mythical and religious and not true.
2006-10-29 23:51:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Creation of course. Look around and tell me what you see.
Man did not create a lot of the things you see and I don't believe the Grand Canyon evolved from anything.
2006-10-29 22:33:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lonesome Dove 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Evolution.
Because I can explain it to a five year old.
2006-10-29 23:07:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Labsci 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is your question?
2006-10-29 21:58:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by geek49203 6
·
0⤊
0⤋