[2] The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.
2006-10-29 12:09:17 · 19 answers · asked by Ford Prefect 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I greatly believe this part of the MCA will be struck down by the USSC. Bush has assumed way too much power.
2006-10-29 12:15:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Violate is more like a traffic law
The constitution is a offering to collective order and justice for Americans.
Bush saw it on the menu of life and chose to have the Pork instead.
Go big Red Go
2006-10-29 12:13:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Bush has successfully removed the Constitution completely. It means you can be arrested, never charged, held indefinitely, tortured, and or killed with no trail, and never be told why? He can make you disappear. Would you call that a violation? Yeah, I think ya could.
2006-10-29 12:18:10 · answer #3 · answered by flip4449 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
not at all, since his act allows for it to be used against terrorist and POW's who are not even on US soil.
And actually this has always been the way it was done, POW's in WWII never had habeas corpus,
the only reason congress had to even make the new law, was that the liberals wanted to give POW's and terrorists rights they never had in the past nor that they should have.
2006-10-29 12:23:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No, if your not a citizen and an enemy combatant the Constitution does not apply to you; I like the old way just shoot them on the spot no trial! Nobody ever said that was unconstitutional...
2006-10-29 12:18:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No Violation was Separation of powers.
2006-10-29 12:26:16 · answer #6 · answered by longroad 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
and so did congress
Of course we violated the constitution by counting blacks as a full person now, instead of 3/5 of one.
2006-10-29 12:14:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Dems have been violating it for decades....
Taking away the rights to Bear Arms....
The right to OWN PROPERTY.
the recent liberal suprem court ruling....
Who will you Blame after Bush retires....hmmm
if your in a lib/dem state....I guess you will blame
the state next to you......
2006-10-29 12:15:52 · answer #8 · answered by Rick D 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Its called martial law and no bush hasn't violated it.
2006-10-29 12:10:56 · answer #9 · answered by paul c 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
of course, cause i dont think we're under invasion or rebellion.
2006-10-29 12:13:02 · answer #10 · answered by cantor85 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋