The house is almost certain. Most of the polling organizations have dismissed all but the smallest of chance for the republicans to retain control of the house of representatives. If elections were held today, democrats would gain 20 plus seats.
The senate is a different story. The democrats need 6 seats more. They will get 4 seats and have a chance to gain as many as 7 seats.
I hope they win. Republicans abandoned conservative values at 9/11. Democrat control will greatly stabilize the congress.
I do worry at Bush's tactics of late. Some how Saddam will be sentenced two days before election instead of a few days past from which it was delayed, IRS is delaying collecting back taxes at the request of the current republican commissioner of the IRS until after the elections. Past IRS officials to hold the spot call it a shame. Who knows what other scandalous stuff is being pulled to buy votes.
2006-10-29 11:33:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's highly unlikely the Dems will take the Senate. They will probably take the House, but not by a large enough margin to really make it anything more then grid-lock.
2006-10-29 11:40:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You recommend 2 federal tax decrease for ALL taxpayers. easy genuine GDP has grown at an typical annual cost of two.5%. He more effective funding for the nationwide technology starting up and nationwide Institutes of well being in his first years of place of work, and created education classes to strengthen the grounding in technology and mathematics for American extreme college students. Bush signed the Medicare Act of 2003, which further prescription drug coverage to Medicare and created well being lower price rates charges, which may allow human beings to placed aside area of their Medicare Tax to construct a "nest egg". The retired persons foyer crew AARP worked with the Bush administration on this methodology and gave their endorsement. Bush suggested the regulation, predicted to fee U.S. $four hundred billion over the first 10years, would provide the elderly "more effective perfect alternatives and larger administration over their well being care" In 2006 Bush declared the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands a nationwide monument, growing to be the biggest marine reserve as a lot as now. The Papahaanaumokuaakea Marine nationwide Monument consists of 80 4 million acres (3400,000km) and is abode to 7,000 species of fish, birds and different marine animals, lots of that are certain to easily those islands. The flow became hailed by technique of conservationists for "its foresight and administration in preserving this staggering section" 50% of Al-Qaeda larger aspect contributors are killed or captured. the international economic corporation list the U.S. GDP #a million contained in the international for 2007. An self sustaining study shows that deaths from terrorism have actual declined by technique of more effective than 40% considering that 2001. less than the Bush administration, homelessness has actual decreased by technique of 12% in line with year between 2005 and 2007. Or do you want to stay at 10% employment,or As of June a million, 2010, the entire Public Debt ideas-blowing became about 88.9% of GDP, and for the first time surpassed $13 trillion you confirm that you want a rustic that would want to preserve itself and it citizen like it did between 2001 - 2006 or a rustic that would want to't help no one.
2016-12-05 08:42:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by mallie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES u can tell by the way cons are shakin and
packing up 2 move in mommys basements
haha
2006-10-29 11:37:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by canada1usa0 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I honestly think they have a good chance , of course, one never knows at the last minute what scandal someone can dig up. But I have great hopes for a turn around. 'bout time too!
2006-10-29 11:28:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by antiekmama 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
I don't think so, I for one think rational people, outnumber the angry irrational people in our Great Nation. You have to stand for something , instead of just against everything.
2006-10-29 11:34:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, and there will be many, many pissed off dems, just like right after any other election (00')(04')
2006-10-29 11:34:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Other than Joe Lieberman, I doubt and significant number will be victorious.
2006-10-29 11:32:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bawney 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hope Not!
2006-10-29 11:27:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by tim b 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, they have no message and are banking on dissatisfation with Republicans.
2006-10-29 11:27:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
2⤊
1⤋