We elected him the first time, bitched about him,and reelected him and we are still bitching. Why can't the USA choose a different leader?
2006-10-29 10:26:49 · 19 answers · asked by Adz 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Somebody said it best. The USA would rather have a leader who is strong and wrong than weak and right. Hopefully, with the election coming up people will realize how foolish they were to be fooled by the Republican strategy about being the party of moral Character(Mark Foley anyone), about being the party against gay marriage( I guess it is OK to vote against gay marriage when gas was less then 2 dollars a gallon. Now that it went up after the election people realized just how little the life was affected by gay relationships) and they were fooled about the war. Hopefully with the Dem's running many candidates with strong military backgrounds they will be able to negate the Republican strategy about being weak on defense.
2006-10-29 10:34:45 · answer #1 · answered by Carlos D 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
President Bush isn't stupid only by way of fact losers say he's. people who can not make a reasoned argument say George W Bush is stupid. those people say President Bush stole the elction. those people will say something different than the apparent, that's in the event that they have been smarter they might have gained the final 2 elections. George W Bush's fighters did not have a greater advantageous plan on how they might run usa of america, so as that they lost their elections. the yank people are not stupid while choosing a President. The losers who did not have a greater advantageous plan are the stupid ones.
2016-10-16 12:56:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with your statement, the public voted him in twice so stop complaining. I am not for him, but I did not like the alternative. This is what happens with a free country that uses a 2 party system. You can't get elected in this country as an independent , no support money to compete with.
2006-10-29 12:11:34 · answer #3 · answered by AJ 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because there idiots, plain and simple. I don't vote , in the first election neither was a good choice and in the second one the same thing. I'm just happy as hell that he can't be elected again.
2006-10-29 12:10:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
As far as the first election, that is still very questionable...as far as Bush really winning it!
The second time around, I don't know. I always thought Americans were smarter that that.
Lets just hope that America has become wise since 2004 and they can show it by voting out the Republican control on November 7th.
2006-10-29 10:31:27 · answer #5 · answered by MSJP 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
caz people are dumb, choosing a bad person to the office.
I am looking forward to the election to see how Bush and his little party struggle to keep their majority.
2006-10-29 10:34:29 · answer #6 · answered by chrishomingtang 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
2004 was a fraudulant and stolen election - just like 2000 was.
2006-10-29 10:46:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We didn't elect him the first time, that election was stolen, the American people chose Gore. The lawyers took away our electoral rights.
Shakespeare was right, First, we kill all the lawyers!
2006-10-29 10:30:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
We elected him because we wanted to. I still don't understand why you liberals don't shut up for the next couple of years until a new conservative president is elected. Then, you can complain about whoever the next one is.
2006-10-29 10:30:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
He wasn't re-elected. For that to have happened, he would have had to be elected the first time, which he wasn't. He was selected.
2006-10-29 10:28:40 · answer #10 · answered by Pretty_Trini_Rican 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋