2006-10-29 10:14:51 · 11 answers · asked by LILY111 1 in Travel ➔ United States ➔ Other - United States
Boston.
I am so freakin sick of Seattle I grew up here
I want out.
2006-10-29 20:23:52 · answer #1 · answered by buterflikizes20 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I really had to choose I would say Seattle because I hear Boston is very prejudiced and they discrimate towards African Americans a lot. Also, the city of Seattle is prettier than Boston. But Seattle has a long rainy season so that can be depressing too.
2006-10-29 11:14:44 · answer #2 · answered by chocolatebabycakes 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've lived in the Boston area my whole life. I love almost everything about the area. The negatives are
1) Cold winters with nowhere to put the snow (in the city).
2) Awful Train system and T system and no way to really fix it.
3) Awful traffic (though it's still better than a lot of other cities)
4) Everywhere within a 60 mile radius of Boston is expensive as all hell with the possible exception of the slummy worcester area.
The positives are
countless
Personally, because living expenses as high as they are, I'm planning on moving to Washington state in January
2006-11-01 18:02:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I live in Seattle and granted I have never been to Boston, though I have always wanted to visit. I have lived on the east coast and been to Philly and D.C. and New York and I really liked the east coast. So if I had the choice, I would rent the moving truck and start packing my boxes tonight.
2006-10-29 12:28:26 · answer #4 · answered by thoor_ballylee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well im from the west coast so seattle,i have been to boston though and if forced to move to the north east i would choose boston over say nyc or philly
2006-10-29 10:23:38 · answer #5 · answered by seth s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what you like to do. Seattle has great for outdoor activities. And, Boston is great for the ''more cultural things''.
2006-10-29 10:35:25 · answer #6 · answered by Shossi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Boston, i've always lived in the east, one of the main reaons is..no earthquakes.
2006-10-29 16:48:07 · answer #7 · answered by OneDay 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I lived in both, i would pick Seattle so much to do in a short distance, hiking, camping, skiing, fishing, hunting, clamming, i think you get it.,
2006-10-29 10:25:06 · answer #8 · answered by edgarrrw 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Boston, closer to my family!
2006-10-29 10:26:04 · answer #9 · answered by dannydolphin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Boston....im not so much for the gloomy days...
2006-10-29 10:17:24 · answer #10 · answered by frecklesnsunkiss 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋