why or why not?
2006-10-29 09:45:41 · 7 answers · asked by gemini_gurl1986 1 in Sports ➔ Tennis
I don't think we should segregate in the first place.
If a women wants to put on pads and play football or wrestle, let her! If a guy wants to cheerlead or play volleyball, why shouldn't he? We are all equal!
And now there is no money issue between men and women, it will be distributed to the activities in accordance with need and revenue the specific sport adds to the school. This way its not a sexist issue, its a demand issue.
2006-10-29 09:53:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, if a girl or woman wants to try out for male sports, that's fine.
The same applies in reverse. We hear about girls or women wanting to try out for male hockey teams, or football teams. As long as they are good enough to make the team, gender shouldn't be a big deal. I think the case you could make against it, is in terms of which sports generate the most revenue. The sports that generate the most revenue (usually men's sports)
would get the bulk of the revenue. This topic has been up for debate in the NCAA, where NCAA college football and NCAA men's basketball generate millions of dollars each season for the
universities. The universities receive much more than they pay
the athletes in terms of scholarships, food and lodging.
2006-10-29 21:53:13 · answer #2 · answered by Answerer17 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. The growth in quality and quantity of athletes and level of play in women's sports in and outside of Tennis has been exceptional ever since the law was passed. It has given a lot of women athletes the opportunity to attend and get a great education on the collegian level that they would not have normally been able to afford.
2006-10-29 18:18:42 · answer #3 · answered by messtograves 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes definitely nowadays sex doesn't really matter. What matters is the skill and ability of a person no matter what the sex is. If a girl has the ability to do an activity that has long been dominated by men why would you stop her? and vice versa for the men as well.
2006-10-30 00:10:33 · answer #4 · answered by kjn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't. The schools should decide how the money is spent. If a school just doesn't have a lot of interest or isn't competitive in a woman's sport they shouldn't be forced to cut money from their winning team to give it to a team that shouldn't be there.
2006-10-30 20:56:01 · answer #5 · answered by Tommy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, beacause girls should get an equal oppertunity to show their talents.
2006-10-29 17:53:37 · answer #6 · answered by ♥iluvfoodnetwork♥ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. because peopele should never be prevented from reaching their full potential.
2006-10-29 17:50:16 · answer #7 · answered by copestir 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋