English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-29 08:57:20 · 22 answers · asked by Shnaricles the mythical panda 4 in Science & Mathematics Geography

22 answers

australria was always the biggest island. trick question

2006-10-29 09:22:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Along the same lines as a previous answer, it was still the largest. The people living there had 'discovered' it before Western explorers came along (but perhaps one could argue they were not aware it was an island).

The issue of continent versus island is not so simple. Long after it was discovered (for at least 200 years) it was referred to as an island. So at the time it was discovered by Western travellers it was considered an island, and thus the biggest.

Apart from all those quibbles the answer is Greenland, having been discovered by Vikings (from the Western perspective) a long time before Australia.

2006-10-29 09:12:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Logic problem solvers would most likely tell you that Australia was still the largest island, even before it was discovered. Even though it hadn't been discovered it still existed !!

Geographers would answer slightly differently. They would argue that Australia is classified as a continent, therefore not an island. In the case of the next largest island after Australia, the answer is Greenland. Curiously enough, the next largest island (land mass) is Borneo.

2006-10-29 09:03:20 · answer #3 · answered by ukneo2000 1 · 1 0

Africa.

If you insist on defining Australia as an "island" , then you must accept that it is an "island continent" and therefore the largest
"island" in the modern world,

Before it was "discovered"? By whom?

Australia was discovered at least 40-140,000 years ago according to the dating methodology used.

Aboriginals who discovered Australia walked there in part from
the narrow bridges that connected the "islands" of the age.

Some went in another direction. Their successors are in the southernmost tip of Latin America.

As the ages changed, so did the land masses. Australia according to one geomorphological source was larger than
that part of Africa that at the time was an island before joinging, drifting middle eastward.

The land masses morphed. "Africa" was no longer an island.

Australia became a continent. Greenland an island.

That's the way I understand it. Prolly all wrong.

,.

2006-10-29 18:19:53 · answer #4 · answered by Solange B 2 · 0 0

You see this is a tricky one, australia apparently is not classed as an island but rather part of a continent, albeit a large part of it. Greenland therefore is the largest.

Antartica is another one, presumably discovered after australia? which again appears to be an island however antartica unlike australia really does constitute the whole of the antartic continent.

2006-10-29 09:14:27 · answer #5 · answered by wave 5 · 0 0

Australia is a continent. but before it was discovered it would of still been the largest island because it is still bigger then all the other islands.

2006-10-30 02:54:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Greenland, and Australia, by definition is an island. The continent is Australasia, which includes many of the Pacific and Indian Ocean islands.

2006-10-29 19:45:58 · answer #7 · answered by cymry3jones 7 · 0 0

People seem to think Australia is a continent by itself.
IT ISNT!!
Australiasia is the continent, which also emcompasses New Zealand, and Australia was always the biggest islands, it didnt need someone to "discover" it.

I hate all this "discovered" business!! Its so patronising to the people who were already there!

2006-10-30 03:22:31 · answer #8 · answered by lovethesun 3 · 0 0

Greenland I think. And Australia IS and island -and a continent.

2006-10-30 03:05:24 · answer #9 · answered by rose_merrick 7 · 0 0

Australia was still the largest island even though it had not been dicovered.

2006-10-29 20:57:51 · answer #10 · answered by ed88 2 · 0 0

just because something isnt discovered doesnt mean it doesnt exist - so it would still be australia by ur definition of an island

2006-10-29 09:05:37 · answer #11 · answered by olivier1uk 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers