English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Thought history, governments have been instituted among men. Philosophically, exactly what is their function? Especially as it relates to the socialization of homo sapiens.

2006-10-29 07:10:48 · 8 answers · asked by Sophist 7 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

Thought = throughout

2006-10-29 07:11:59 · update #1

Government is instituted among me to
1) provide protection from other governments
2)provide for domestic tranquility
3) execute those tasks necessary for public works that benefit the society
4)secure the blessings of a fruitful society.

2006-10-29 13:18:43 · update #2

Governments are instituted by men

2006-11-04 16:03:39 · update #3

8 answers

it is my job as a businessman to create a monopoly, it is your job as a government to stop me

if you dont stop me, you are an institution not a government as you are running like a business

2006-11-05 13:40:24 · answer #1 · answered by tony h 4 · 0 1

Well loss of govt is known as "anarchy". At the center of presidency is "coercion" or as a substitute "vigour". Government has as a salient attribute the proper to make use of drive to implement it is will, movements, or ideas. Now, I could hold that any sufficiently gigantic organization of folks will have to have an enforcement mechanism, and that is "govt." So in that feel, I could say "society" as we are aware of it -- gigantic numbers of men and women, chiefly within the country wide and international feel we presently use, have to have govt to be able to enable orderly functioning. People are included through the present govt something or not it's; industrial transactions (exchange) are made more secure or normally simply viable considering the fact that of authorized methods, and many others. But no, it isn't precise that every one societies have got to have 'govt" within the conventional western feel. Societies do exist with out formal govt. If you had been to consult with an Amazon Rain Forest tribe you regularly could no longer uncover elections, legitimate activity titles,mayors, cops, courts of legislation, and many others. But you could nonetheless uncover a functioning society which has mechanisms for offering for the matters wanted. Of path those folks have a lot much less want for some of the trappings of presidency. The methods they have got constructed to manage the problems a central authority could deal with may not paintings with gigantic plenty of folks as they're predicated on current values, verbal exchange, and relationships. And then on the finish of the day, I consider should you had been sufficiently rebellious to the best way matters are performed within the Amazon rain wooded area, and also you persisted to cheat folks or deal unfarily and refuse to recognize the movements of the ones whose activity it's in that society to do the matters that govt is approximately -- you could be expelled and even finished.

2016-09-01 04:23:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well, to normalize all that which was politically decided upon. To reify, to institutionalize arbitration, which far from necessary, is part of the constant process of action and deliberation. If we constantly had to re-institute fundamental parameters behind legal action, there would be no background assumptions to work upon and any system, thus thrown, would succumb to the harangues of revolution.

Government ceremonializes what "we take to be self-evident". That's the whole function, located somewhere -- the capital-- under time-tested habituation, it establishes Right, where there is naught but compliance to arbitrary facts.

2006-10-29 07:26:08 · answer #3 · answered by -.- 6 · 0 1

We are led to believe that the function is up to the society that it serves.
But how can we control it being many with many differing opinions?
So far, the best answer is to vote for someone who you think will help do the things to make that happen.
So then it comes down to the power of numbers. Will there be enough people who vote the way you do?

2006-10-29 07:18:36 · answer #4 · answered by davezathome 2 · 0 1

Governments are formed and reformed as part of the process by which humanity is learning to develop a harmonious system of organizing resources both locally and globally for a sustainable healthy planet.

Laws were created to control property and space, since people with individual wills have to balance personal freedom and interests with peace and security for the greater public good. Managing the population of any community or nation depends on controlling ownership of land and property locally, as well as defining boundaries in the global economy. So written contracts developed to define ownership, to protect public and private interests and to punish violations as a deterrent to crime; which started with local jurisdiction and spread to greater global levels as international interactions increased. (Please refer to the Code of Hammurabi and the Ten Commandments as early examples of church and state laws.) Because the system of primogeniture, where property was passed from fathers to oldest sons, marriage laws were used to control women and children as property as assets of the family estate. Since the masses of people were illiterate, the church clergy have dominated historical documentation of marriage laws and contracts and governmental policies, although for tens of thousands of years before patriarchal institutions there were matriarchal societies by which ownership was passed from mother to daughter in a more egalitarian spirit of equal partnership than the feudalistic systems of top down management that still prevail today in politics and economics.

According to Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence, the powers of just government are derived from the "consent of the governed"; and indeed, people throughout history have sought to fulfill natural laws of governance by seeking to create and improve upon institutions to reflect the consent of the people as necessary for a binding and fair social contract. However, as countries and societies continue the process of developing into democratic self-governing local entities, in the meantime the pattern that history has followed is that a controlling parent country will develop or dominate a colony or community until that group becomes educated and developed enough to become independent as an entity with viable economy and government.

The key to perfecting democratic government and localized economies lies with education. As the populations in developing regions become literate in writing their own policies and also in financial planning and business management, there will be limited top-down management and more localized control. This trend will eventually eliminate the wasteful bureaucracy we see today with too much control of collective resources under large governments, instead of smaller localized government with more direct accountability and representation to the governed citizens.

2006-10-29 08:39:31 · answer #5 · answered by emilynghiem 5 · 0 1

Government is monopoly force in society. It must always be kept at bay.

2006-10-29 07:14:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

governing the society.

2006-10-29 07:30:42 · answer #7 · answered by prince47 7 · 0 1

to piss off us commoners

2006-10-29 07:13:37 · answer #8 · answered by aussie3 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers