World peace, or the reversal of global warming?
2006-10-29 07:07:32 · 9 answers · asked by sekhtet 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
World Peace because if we had the reversal of Global Warming
we would have Global Freezing and another ice age.
2006-10-29 07:30:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
World Peace because if we do not accomplish that we may not have a world that Global Warming will even matter to. After some nuclear weapons go off I think Global Warming will be the least of our worries.
2006-10-29 15:54:14 · answer #2 · answered by TritanBear 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
World peace would open up the human mind to more humane and greater understandings. World peace would lead to a reduction of pollution, you can't have a world peace when you pollute someone's back yard can you? Keep in mind everything that would need to be bettered for world peace. Better economic system, value of life, greatly reduced crime, equality, and a lack of ignorance to anyone else. You apply all those things to the global warming situation, how would each of those help the global warming situation? No money issues with economics, so greed gets taken out of the equation. Value of life higher would keep polution at bay as well as welcome new ideas on how to better live without the cost to the environment. Reduced crime, equality, and lack of ignorance would free up the mind to focus on serious issues of global warming and come to better conclusions than the ones that are currently in place. World peace would achieve greater sucess, might even reduce global warming when all the bits and pieces of world peace fall into place.
2006-10-29 15:23:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Reversing global warming leaves us to live longer in an uncivil world. Creating world peace would only last as long as it will take the world's gasses to burn out. One way out. Think peace in your own corner and put all energies into the reversal of global warming...
2006-10-29 15:16:27 · answer #4 · answered by lee f 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
World peace would benifit the world now and hurt later while the reversal of global warming wouldn't do much now but down the road it would help.
2006-10-29 15:11:45 · answer #5 · answered by tallspot07 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say that reversal of global warming woulld be more momentous because if you take world peace it wont last very long. but if you reverse global warming the world lasts longer.Because world peace will last untill some person goes into another country and defames it
2006-10-29 15:28:34 · answer #6 · answered by bama_black_belt 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
World peace. Global warming is a politcized theory.
2006-10-29 15:10:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Reversal of gobal warming. World peace would only be temporary.
2006-10-29 15:18:49 · answer #8 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The former is so abstract and meaningless, it might well entail the latter, be impossible, or antithetical to what we actually conceive it to be.
Global Warming is about as concrete a scientific fact can get.
I pick #2, though I doubt "the world" cares about it either way.
2006-10-29 15:30:09 · answer #9 · answered by -.- 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋