2006-10-29 05:52:11 · 10 answers · asked by stephentoddking 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
I don't know. Madonna is a stupid prick that decided to offend every person in England by taking on a fake English accent, then offend every lesbian on earth by making out with Britney Spears (showing women everywhere to embraces their sexuality and make out with people half their age). Then again, Angelina has huge friggin' lips, but I still somehow feel that Angelina would be a better parent.
I really didn't have anything useful to say...sorry about that...
2006-10-29 05:56:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Madonna and Angelina have adopted from different countries in Africa, both with very different laws. Also, David still has family in Africa; Zahara was an orphan.
2006-10-29 14:35:42 · answer #2 · answered by Shayna 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Madonna shouldn`t even be associated with the name of Madonna. She has done everything she can to shock and mock us with her obsenities. I read the other replies and some were saying little David had a father. The truth of the fact is the father of little David had second thoughts about letting his child be adopted when he found out it was Madonna. This was on the news.
2006-10-29 13:59:28 · answer #3 · answered by Sparkles 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think neither of these women should have adopted a child from Africa. Before anyone goes nuts and calls me prejudice please try understanding my reasoning.
There are many orphan children in America and Great Britain (Madonna's husband is a British citizen) that need a loving family. Why go to Africa to adopt if it is a matter of love and not press coverage? They have claimed it brings awareness to African poverty , has poverty been eliminated in either Great Britain or the US and someone forgot to inform the media?
2006-10-29 14:02:32 · answer #4 · answered by Akkita 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The main reason that Madonna's adoption is controversial is that the little boy still has his father. She didn't adopt an "orphan"
2006-10-29 13:55:18 · answer #5 · answered by treymf 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because little "David" still has a father and relatives in his homeland. So- taking him from his relatives and whisking him away to Britain seems like a really crass thing to do. She could have given his father money so that the man could afford to take his son out of the orphanage and support him!
2006-10-29 13:54:58 · answer #6 · answered by cheyennetomahawk 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
madonna is old and shes still trying to be young, angelina is a goddess whos trying to be old plus she really does care about these kids
2006-10-29 13:55:12 · answer #7 · answered by ceesteris 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its OK for either. The difference is Madge used her celebrity to cut through the massive paperwork.
2006-10-29 14:00:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cos madonna's too old.
Touch me I'm good.
Yes.
Oh Yes.
2006-10-29 13:55:10 · answer #9 · answered by mattJ 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
its not and.......it is angelina jolie
2006-10-29 16:58:37 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋