Who are you voting for? The republican or the democractic?
2006-10-29 05:16:40 · 21 answers · asked by ? 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
George Washington, and many of his supporters and friends did not believe in a two party form of government. As it is, our country is a Republic. If you don't believe me, look it up. I only wish that we didn't have names and classifications for our choices, but that we could just vote for a person. If we could only eliminate the division of people by having to call them anything but humans, maybe we could come together and make something happen. I vote for people, not the named parties. Which means that I won't be voting until the names of political parties are eliminated; so that people can just vote their conscience. Political parties are not moralities, a conscience, or a way of life. They are just a way to divide people, and separate them from one another. All too often all you see is one side saying something bad about the other, and then they can't work together. People and politicians vote, and believe all along party lines. In a way, that is a form of brain washing. On both sides. I won't be voting for either, since by voting for either side, I would be choosing to separate my fellow humans from each other. I consider male or female human. I consider all races human. I consider all religions human. I refuse to separate my fellow humans from one another by voting and promoting the idea that we are different from each other by political party. We are all human beings first. From the womb. No one can refute that.
2006-10-29 05:55:05 · answer #1 · answered by kingsley88_2000 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The Democrats, across the board. Not because I hate Republicans, but because as a party, they've become corrupt. It's what power does. The Democrats were kicked out of Congress in 1994 for the same reason. It seems that every so often we have to make a clean sweep. If the Republicans remain in power after the elections, Bush will believe that the people are happy with his methods, which are underhanded. Someday, I guess I'll have to vote for the Republicans, when the Democratic Party becomes full of itself, full of s---, and ready for the axe again.
2006-10-29 05:26:52 · answer #2 · answered by jean_kilczer 1 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Moderate Democrats
2006-10-29 05:24:42 · answer #3 · answered by nightrambling 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Both parties are making me mad now. Although I have leaned Republican in the past. Both parties seem to be more caught up in serving the party rather than the people who elected them.
We need to get back to a government "By the people for the people."
2006-10-29 06:08:32 · answer #4 · answered by Beam 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Democratic
2006-10-29 05:24:53 · answer #5 · answered by Granny 1 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Proud Texas Democrat! P.S. sorry for being from the same state as the Biggest Loser ever GWB!
2006-10-29 10:52:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Democrat of course. The only way to get congress to control its spending is to get a president in office that will veto the bills of that congress. Bush will only veto bills if it will help republicans and hurt democrats.
Therefore balancing the budget means getting democrats in congress so bush can oppose them.
2006-10-29 05:23:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Independent.
2006-10-29 05:31:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Democratic all the way
2006-10-29 05:31:17 · answer #9 · answered by traxx10 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Non-incumbents. Many wiser minds than mine have suggested over the years that frequent changes of those in power are the only insurance against corruption and tyranny.
2006-10-29 05:24:44 · answer #10 · answered by OccumsRevelation 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋