2006-10-29 04:32:30 · 8 answers · asked by ANN 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
It's worse not being allowed to ask a question, because that affects your success, but not being allowed to answer a question affects someone else's success.
2006-10-29 04:50:51 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think not being able to ask a question is worse. When you ask a question you have given food for thought. When we are able to question the validity and meaning of things, then we have met our human potential, instead of following as sheep or robots.
There can be many answers to one question; and even if that answer cannot be expressed, the question has stimulated different perspectives and view points.
2006-10-29 12:39:19 · answer #2 · answered by danaluana 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not being allowed to ask a question..
It is a truly horrible feeling to have your quest for knowledge limited.
2006-10-29 12:34:05 · answer #3 · answered by falzalnz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not being allowed to ask, the answer may remain with you.
2006-10-29 18:56:17 · answer #4 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the worse is not to be able to hear the question or to see the answer
2006-10-29 12:40:46 · answer #5 · answered by Mr.Mu 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh, I think liver cancer is worse than either of them
2006-10-29 12:39:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For me it would be both! I'm nosey AND I love putting my 2 cents in.
2006-10-29 12:34:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Six of one, and a half dozen of the other.
2006-10-29 12:34:59 · answer #8 · answered by WC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋