compare and contrast the way in which economic develpoement affected politics in virginia and massachusetts?

Question

from the period of 1607 to1750.
please site all refeerences

Answer 1

is that all....?

....AND CITE ALL REFERENCES!!!!

... because you wouldn't want someone taking credit for someone else's work right....?

...RIGHT!!!!!??????

....like you're trying to do!?!?!?

Answer 2

Reagan's financial planned replaced into based on the assumption of a "trickle down effect". It replaced into later often dubbed "Reaganomics". the assumption in the back of it replaced into which you provide the precise 2% of human beings (the richest share) important tax cuts then the wealth they convey mutually will provide way onto something persons. This ideology is incorrect besides the shown fact that. It made the burden tougher on the middle-classification that's the returned-bone of usa. They weren't waiting to spend as plenty, purchase as plenty, pay as plenty and the financial equipment suffered. the precise 2% stored all of their wealth and that i'm optimistic popular healthful believe money for childrens infants. This ideology replaced into used in the process the reagan/bush and bush/mondale years and left Clinton with an marvelous debt. Clinton reversed the tax shape to the place the greater you're making the greater they take and in 8 years left our u . s . with a surplus and had SSI paid for some years. George W. gets elected and we shift returned to "reaganomics". Debt piles up, rich get richer, middle-classification starts to go through. 8 years later right here we are. The Obama financial equipment plans to shift returned to what worked which replaced into the Clinton era economics. in easy terms time will tell the way it does this pass around. historic previous shows us it is going to artwork.