English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what is the difference in a man's organ being circumsized or having a foreskin? what does being circumsized mean? and whats good or enjoyable for a girl?

2006-10-29 03:37:55 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

13 answers

I think most of the info's in the answers above. Here in the UK it's not that common unless you're Jewish (and I think Muslims do too? but I'm not certain), but I believe in the US it's done quite routinely on a lot of boys, for supposed medical rather than religious reasons.
For a girl, I've no idea what's enjoyable - for us men, I think sex is pretty much the same (and it doesn't even look that different once it's erect), but for a handjob you need to use lube usually or it gets sore. Most of my friends, lovers, ex-boyfriends etc were not circumcised, and it never occurred to most of them to even ask.
Are you wondering which will be better for sex with you? Because if so, I think you posted in the wrong section, but I hope you got the info you needed, anyway.

2006-10-29 03:57:38 · answer #1 · answered by JBoy Wonder 4 · 0 0

Not being female, I can't imagine there is a difference in sensation between a circumsized or uncircumsized penis.

When born, boys have an extra bit of skin that covers the head of their penis. This is the foreskin. It can be cleanly imagined if you were to turn a sock inside out but stop halfway. The tube covering the toe section is similar to a foreskin.

Apart from its religious significance to Jewish people, there is little reason to have boys circumsized today. Men with foreskins have to take special care to clean the area carefully as dirt and bacteria can collect under the foreskin. It is thought that the head of the penis is more sensitive in uncircumsized men than for those who are circumsized and have the head exposed.

2006-10-29 03:55:19 · answer #2 · answered by dougeebear 7 · 0 0

You answer your question in your question. The difference is that if you are circumsized you no longer have your foreskin - or all of it, and if you're not circumsized, you still do. Circumcision is the removal of some or all of the foreskin (prepuce) from the penis.

I think you will likely find both very enjoyable with the right person.

2006-10-29 03:46:09 · answer #3 · answered by Axel Foley 1 · 0 0

lol, strange section to ask such a question dont ya think?

Being circumzized means they cut the forskin off either at birth, or at the coming of adulthood, at age 13, for Jewish boys. In Judiasm, it is a commandment of Abraham that all boys be circumsized at birth, its called a bris, and its a big ceremony and very important in the religion.

As far as whats good and enjoyable for the mans partner, I think that will vary widely from person to person. Some people like it, some think its gross and unclean. You always have to remember to clean that area, and some men dont, then it can become infected, which in turn, could give the mans partner an infection.

2006-10-29 03:45:37 · answer #4 · answered by arielsalom33 4 · 0 0

Alot of circumsizim comes from religious beliefs. But also some are for health reasons. When my husband was born 63 years ago he was not circumize due to he was an ill baby he family is catohlic. But it never was done. This year at age 63 he was circumsized due o health. The forskin had shurnk and he was in deep pain due to he was not able to use the restroom or if an erection he was in unbearable pain. The penis could not erect through the foreskin. So he had surgery and all is fine now. They say that the foreskin at times does shrink due to diabties...he is not. But he lived in alot of pain. And for good or enjoyble for girl..as long as she loves her man...does it matter?

2006-10-29 03:44:17 · answer #5 · answered by Granny Possm 1 · 0 0

When a man is born, there is a piece of skin called the "foreskin" covering the end of his penis. Most of it is cut off during a circumcision. There is some medical evidence that circumcision prevents infection of the glans. But merely keeping clean can do the same thing.
There is no scientific evidence that shows a difference in sexual satisfaction given by circumcised versus uncircumcised men.

2006-10-29 03:46:41 · answer #6 · answered by sandislandtim 6 · 1 0

Men who are circumcised have the fore skin cut off. This is an unnecessary procedure that date back from old Judea times and has been forwarded to the present day. Unfortunately it can cause ED in men in later years. It cuts necessary blood and nerve endings off. As far as how it feels for the woman I don't know. That's a question for the women. Since most of the stimulation is from the clitoris and the first 2 inches of the Virgina I imagine it makes no real difference.

2006-10-29 03:44:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

1) Vaginal dryness and female arousal A study by psychologists Bensley & Boyle (2003) reported that vaginal dryness tends to be a problem when the male partner is circumcised.[22] Bensley et al. reported that the lack of a foreskin in the male partner produces symptoms similar to those of female arousal disorder. (But the authors of the study stated that their method of selecting people to ask was not reliable.)

2)The American Academy of Pediatrics states "a survey of adult males using self-report suggests more varied sexual practice and less sexual dysfunction in circumcised adult men. There are anecdotal reports that penile sensation and sexual satisfaction are decreased for circumcised males. Masters and Johnson noted no difference in exteroceptive and light tactile discrimination on the ventral or dorsal surfaces of the glans penis between circumcised and uncircumcised men."[44] The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) states "The effect of circumcision on penile sensation or sexual satisfaction is unknown. Because the epithelium of a circumcised glans becomes cornified, and because some feel nerve over-stimulation leads to desensitization, many believe that the glans of a circumcised penis is less sensitive. Opinions differ about how this decreased sensitivity, which may result in prolonged time to orgasm, affects sexual satisfaction. An investigation of the exteroceptive and light tactile discrimination of the glans of circumcised and uncircumcised men found no difference on comparison. No valid evidence to date, however, supports the notion that being circumcised affects sexual sensation or satisfaction."[68]

2006-10-29 03:46:40 · answer #8 · answered by DadOnline 6 · 0 1

Jim in all probability has it approximately good--- virtually a hundred% for adult men 30 or older however the proportion drops like a rock for youthful adult men, and in easy terms approximately 50% of newborns now. yet plenty greater adult men around from age 30 to a hundred so as that keeps the proportion up. In 10 to fifteen years it relatively is going to likely be a toss up no rely if adult men are decrease or no longer proportion smart, after which drop today because of the fact the older dudes die off.

2016-10-20 23:11:20 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

circumcision is the act of cutting off the foreskin, other than aesthetics vaginal intercourse shouldn't be affected, if performing oral there may be excess skin that needs to be pulled back. it's actually barbaric and there's no reason for it. in America it used to be the norm but the pendulum is swinging back to leaving it natural. Jewish people do it for religious reasons ( i don't know what they are) it actually desensitizes the penis decreasing a mans pleasure............

2006-10-29 22:19:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers