Cindy Sheehan has only asked to face George Walker Bush so she can ask him what the noble cause was that her son was massacred over in Iraq for.
Bush refuses to face her, perhaps because there was no noble cause except for him & cheney to get richer on Iraq'a oil.
In my book, the man is a coward for not having the gonads to face the parents of our fallen soldiers.
See what one Rebulican says:
"Cindy Sheehan did the attacking."
If Bush was 1/2 of a man he would face Cindy and give her the peace that this woman deserves instead of hiding out from her.
2006-10-29 02:51:27 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Obviously, the buck gets passed in this White House.
2006-10-29 02:53:08 · update #1
Because he was a coward during Viet Nam, he didnt even have the courage to show up for his guard duty, he sent our children off to war, and he ought to beable to look their surrivers in the eye and say thank you for your son/daughter's sacrifice. Maybe the fact he can't says that yes the evil bastard has some sort of a conscience after all
2006-10-29 02:56:27 · answer #1 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
If you would look into your facts without buying in all the media hype you would know President Bush spoke to Cindy Sheehan and her husband right after their son was killed.
Once the media latched on to her - her demand was to meet the President and speak . Clearly something that had already happened but the media "forgot" about.
There are many families in the US that see Ms Sheehan in a bad light. I for one want to ignore her.
She does nothing for her son's memory. Her son , Casey gladly enlisted in the United States military and re-enlisted to go to Iraq. He proudly served his country and should be honored for that fact. She won't even let the military provide him with a marking as it would violate her privacy when she visits his graveside. The same privacy she milks by posing on his grave for magazines.
My son fought in Iraq. All he ever said then the press coverage was high and her face was on most channels "Please change to something else". No angry , no screaming just a quiet request.
So get on your soap box and scream to your hearts content.
Both I and my son have served in the military. And though we may not agree with what you or she has to say. We will defend your right to say it.
That is what makes America a free country today.
2006-10-29 03:07:17 · answer #2 · answered by Akkita 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Is Cindy Sheehan supposed to be important!? Stop blathering and babbling nonsensical statements! Cindy Sheehan is a political freak who did not take care of her son, did not respect his choices in life, and dishonored his memory in the way she has behaved. She only wanted a PUBLIC Spectacle for her own gain, and/or that of the DNC, since he HAS already met with her and expressed his condolences.
President Bush is too smart for her or the DNC. She's apparently unstable and quite possibly a threat to security. I think the Secret Service should taze her on site regularly. Thanks for asking! I know my answer has helped you immensely and you are welcome!
2006-10-29 03:06:16 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
a daft media ploy. Makes Bush stupider than ever , via his trivializing of the conflict. His golf activity replace into probably even worse than his Iraq approach, so he stopped enjoying with the intention to save himself embarrassment. His next steps might desire to be, to withdraw the troops, and resign the Presidency. yet i would not carry my breath
2016-10-16 12:42:02 · answer #4 · answered by lurette 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Bush did meet with Sheehan, just like he has met with all the loved ones of fallen soldiers. Sheehan had her chance in the first meeting with President Bush, but that was before the left wing wackos got to her. Now that she has been brainwashed by the left, she wants a second meeting.
2006-10-29 02:59:19 · answer #5 · answered by babe 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
W has met with her and countless other families of the fallen.
Cindy has been co-opted by the left as a poster child, and don't be surprised if in 4 years they try to run her for office.
Also where is her husband in this, perhaps at home respecting their son's choice to enlist in a Military and fight in a war he believed in.
It sucks and its sad that she lost her son, but that does not give her a blank check to say and do anything she pleases and break the law to do it. As you may recall the original tent camp she worked out of during her protests in Crawford were on his private property and erected without permission, if W were the heartless A* hole you paint him as why didn't he simply have them all arrested for trespassing. as it stands I believe a neighboring rancher who bought into her hype is allowing them to use his land now.
2006-10-29 04:03:20 · answer #6 · answered by janssen411 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why in the world would ANYONE want to meet the screaming mimi who calls you a killer?
The Demoncrats are just using her and she's too hysterical to notice that. What will happen to her when or if the Demoncrats win any election? They won't need her anymore and they certainly won't be standing next to her in public again. The media will quit giving her time and she'll be sitting alone in her new house the Demoncrats bought her in Crawford and she'll have the time to think about what she's been doing. She's in for a living hell then.
2006-10-29 03:05:01 · answer #7 · answered by JEREMY 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
What is so surprising about his being a wimpy weenie? He didn't have the courage to show up to sit around a Stateside base and eat donuts when he was in the National Guard!
2006-10-29 02:54:50 · answer #8 · answered by eilishaa 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think he feels responsible for the death of the soldier, cause he sent them to Iraq. For what ever reason? I mean there were no reason for them to go to the Iraq.They didn`t find any Weapons!The man is a coward if he can`t even take a little time to talk to a mother that just lost her son!
2006-10-29 02:59:56 · answer #9 · answered by janene_balugani 1 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Our President has already met with Cindy Sheehan, but after she revealed herself as a shill for the liberals he is justified in not meeting with her again. Your question proves that nothing will convince you, but if you think he has not met with her then you need to go to the archives of the Media and you will see that he did.
2006-10-29 02:58:37 · answer #10 · answered by daydoom 5 · 5⤊ 4⤋