2006-10-29 01:59:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
no i dont but they deserved to go to extra time though.
2006-10-29 02:16:43 · answer #1 · answered by Deano™ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Judging by the unfair means by which Fabio Grosso dived to win Italy a penalty in injury time, Australia deserved to at least take the match into extra-time. Coming out to say that Australia should have won the match is a bold statement to say the least, but they definitely did not deserve to lose in such a manner.
However, this is football in its current state, and little can be done to rectify such 'wrongdoing'.
2006-10-29 02:06:54 · answer #2 · answered by L 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The game should at least gone into extra time... but i dun agree tat Aus should have won since a man down doesn't mean they will certainly lose... if the italians can hold on in extra time, it can go either way during the spot kicks...
2006-10-29 04:49:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no , and even if Aus, deserved to win that match he must be neutral. I mean in his position he shouldn't show how much he hates the Italian team.
Italy played with only 10 players in that match and if he thinks the penalty was unfair he must have missed the final game where the penalty wasn't fair either.
I asked the same question pls let me know what do u think :
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlL87djO7ZyRO24iQWRSXojsy6IX?qid=20061029052113AAIJUoR
2006-10-29 02:09:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!!! even if the penalty wasn't awarded to Italy they still would have gone into overtime, therefore he wouldn't know exactly which team would win.
2006-10-29 11:05:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sorry nope i totally dont agree 100%!
but ill tell u something
Australia did play very good
while playing with Italy!
but to bad Italy won
hehe
2006-10-29 02:15:15 · answer #6 · answered by Pinky 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't.
2006-10-29 06:17:14 · answer #7 · answered by Marko 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋