I have a IBM that I use to test DOS programs with it. It has a whopping 6mhz intel CPU, 2mb ram and a huge 10mb HDD. The thing still works and runs DOS programs great. Just wondering if anyone had any smaller speed , ram
2006-10-28 19:34:42 · 5 answers · asked by champion_83_87 2 in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Laptops & Notebooks
My first IBM PC has no HDD, has two 5.25 floppy drives instead + 640 K RAM. CPU frequency... i even cannot recall :-)
Before this, i worked with PDP-11 with 64 K RAM and only one floppy drive. Floppy disk has 200K capacity.
2006-10-28 19:39:59 · answer #1 · answered by alakit013 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LINUX is the a lot less source hungry operating equipment. It al;so has the smallest footprint (area used from the perplexing stress) as an social gathering, cautioned minimum criteria for Ubuntu Linux are: # a million GHz x86 processor (Pentium 4 or better effective) # 512 MiB of equipment memory (RAM) # 5 GB of perplexing-stress area # pix card and computer screen able to 800x600 # both a CD/DVD stress or a USB port (or both) # information superhighway get authentic of entry to is useful do no longer forget that those are cautioned minimums. Ubuntu may even run strong with basically 256 MiB of RAM and a six hundred MHz processor (eg Pentium 3) For smaller distributions they're far a lot less, social gathering for domestic dog Linux: 100MHz CPU and 64MB of RAM or better effective and that i completely trust Kevin, Linux is much better effective than abode windows
2016-10-16 06:50:22 · answer #2 · answered by rothi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My first computer was a Mac Classic. It had an 8 MHz CPU, 1 MB RAM, and a 40 MB Hard Drive. I wish I still had it though.
2006-10-28 19:44:38 · answer #3 · answered by eric_bev 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about an old Commodore 64?
It had 64K of ram and NO HardDrive Space.
Yet, it was the king of it's day.
2006-10-28 19:38:31 · answer #4 · answered by KOKOMOJO 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
comadore pet 16 bit basic
2006-10-28 19:37:58 · answer #5 · answered by Douglas G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋