I like TNA in some way's and WWE in others. I like wwe's storylines better but I like what TNa is doing right now between Angle and Joe. Kurt TNAngle rock!
2006-10-28 18:50:13 · 20 answers · asked by anthony g 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Smackdown is becoming boring, ECW is too short, and RAW has dull stories
TNA is becoming very interesting, their is even a new rumor that Bret Hart may return just to have a chance to wrestle against an Olympic Gold medalist.
2006-10-28 19:12:39 · answer #1 · answered by mightywok 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA is without a doubt better than the WWE. TNA has better wrestlers, a cooler 6 sided ring, better match types. TNA is innovative & doesn't try to redo or rehash everything that has already been done before. TNA even has better announcers.
WWE does way more talking than wrestling.
WWE sucks compared to TNA!
If you are a true wrestling fan & do not like TNA you are not a true fan in my opinion.
2006-10-29 08:51:16 · answer #2 · answered by BKW 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
TNA doesnt have much of a storyline.. it has weeeeeek wrestlers ... the ring looks weird... but somehow some of the wrestlers are going in tna (dont know why) but all in all WWE is better and more fun to watch
2006-10-29 01:53:24 · answer #3 · answered by Jason M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE is better entertainment but TNA has better and more inovative matches. They have some amazing athletes over there in TNA but it's an obvious WCW rip off and their guys have no mic skills cause their interviews are some of the sorriest I've ever seen. They have enough WWE vets over there to school them on how to cut a promo but I watch both at times.
2006-10-28 19:02:03 · answer #4 · answered by Hendo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've been watching WWE, only because I didn't have WCW to watch. Now that TNA is getting better, I'm leaning toward them. I'm one of those people who watches both, because they're on different nights. If the Monday Night Wars start again, I may turn to TNA, because the quality of the matches are better.
2006-10-28 18:54:55 · answer #5 · answered by irish_mick_25 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
WWE is better than TNA. TNA fights r too short and nothing interesting than wwe. If anyone come in TNA from WWE i'm sure that WWE player will win. WWE have better fighter than TNA. TNA fighter r just in normal size they dont have good body
2006-10-29 04:30:31 · answer #6 · answered by khizar_dude 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
TNA has a lot of old and new superstars like AJ Styles and Sting,Scott Steiner and Nash.TNA also has better storylines which is why loads more of WWE Superstars are going to TNA like Kane and Benoit
2006-10-29 02:22:33 · answer #7 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WWE was sarted much earlier than TNA. WWE has many High Profile wrestlers unlike TNA. WWE also has more number of Big events. So I think WWE is much better than TNA
2006-10-28 18:53:25 · answer #8 · answered by kalyan r 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
ok tna sux. every time that retarded crowd chant tna i say sux. ex tna sux tna sux tna sux. wwe has lets see 1 2 3 4 5 and 6 shows. tna has 1 hour and even with the 2 hr time slot ther not going to put every wrestler on. and angle is an olympic *** hole.
2006-10-29 00:49:01 · answer #9 · answered by wwe and tna r = 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
TNA they actually wrestle and entertain unlike the wwe
2006-10-31 02:51:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I still think WWE is better because, like you, I believe WWE's story lines are better, but TNA is on the rise.
2006-10-29 05:11:00 · answer #11 · answered by Thomas C 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋