2006-10-28 18:29:09 · 19 answers · asked by Krumpits&Tea☺ 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
The Beatles are a fine wine and better with age.
The Stones are a good whisky, drunk by the bottle when young, and fine for sipping as you get older.
2006-10-28 18:37:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Rolling Stones
2006-10-29 01:34:47 · answer #2 · answered by jenii75 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rolling Stones
2006-10-29 01:32:17 · answer #3 · answered by SweetBrunette 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rolling Stones!
2006-10-29 01:30:06 · answer #4 · answered by *ღ♥۩ THEMIS ۩♥ღ* 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Rolling Stones don't even deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as The Beatles.
2006-10-29 01:49:09 · answer #5 · answered by Hoopfan 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stones
2006-10-29 01:30:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rolling Stones!!!!!!
2006-10-29 01:32:31 · answer #7 · answered by char__c is a good cooker 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well It's hard to say........ The Beatles because they have better songs and there music is more diverse.From hard rock songs like helter skelter and soft songs like Dear Prudence the Beatles Rule George Paul John and Ringo 4 ever Yoko Ono would rule 4 ever but she's not technically a beatle
2006-10-29 01:35:37 · answer #8 · answered by KISS FAN!! 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rolling Stones no question.
2006-10-29 01:37:18 · answer #9 · answered by canadarikki 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the Beatles
2006-10-29 01:53:12 · answer #10 · answered by kate 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋