Since Sign Language is the 3rd most used recognized language in the USA .. based on that fact .. if I could still hear and see .. I guess I could still communicate through sign lanugage and gestures without speaking. Not that I would want to make a choice like that. Good Luck ! :)
2006-10-28 17:28:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by tysavage2001 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Speaking.
2006-10-29 00:27:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by kayboff 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I could live without speaking, but not without sight and sound.
2006-10-29 00:27:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by old lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Speaking because I need to see things! Also I'm more of an observer than a speaker, I'd rather want to know whats going on around me than interact and know nothing.
Whats pen and paper for! lol
Nothing can really replace hearing or sight.
Also I can take up sign language.
2006-10-29 00:28:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Melissa 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Speaking because I could just write everything down
2006-10-29 00:26:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by angel_lillian001 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would be hearing for me, I could always watch movies with captions but I'd want to be able to express myself anytime I wanted to. Sight , I like to draw etc.. would not do withought it I'd be devastated.
2006-10-29 07:46:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nanci 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
sight cause lust comes from seeing and that means anything you see ( not just women ) anything ! wisdom from hearing so i need ears and i need to speak to tell someone whats on my heart
2006-10-29 00:38:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i say speaking because i would still be able to be independent and communicate with other by sign language or writing.
2006-10-29 00:40:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by super girl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a toughie...I can't live without music, so I'll go with sight.
2006-10-29 00:26:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by ~carmie~ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
speaking
2006-10-29 00:31:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Gypsy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋