does limited-fortunes capitalism [lfc] mean paying EVERYONE what they earn, paying NO ONE for no work?

Question

ie, minimising overpay/ overpower/ tyranny/ undemocracy?

& minimising underpay/ underpower/ slavery/ undemocracy, ie, maximising justice, & reaping peace/ no war?

the rich sometimes grumble about paying unemployment benefit but it seems that NO ONE has realised that the overpaid get MANY MANY unemplmnt benefits - ie, that they get paid for their work & then get up to 3 million unempl benefits on top of fairpay for their work

[if we assume the unemployment benefit is 3rd of the world-average hourly pay - which is US$15/hr, if we pay housewives/homemakers & students, as we should do in justice [pay for wrk], & since the highest hourly pay peaks at a million times average]

now WHY is it that no one has thought of that?

the superoverpaid sometimes begrudge one unemployment benefit, & the rest of us suckers never even think of begrudging the superoverpaid up to 3 million unempl benefits

is it automatic unthinking deference to alpha males?

golden calf syndrome?

Answer 1

Where would all the motivation to work come from if there was a cap on what you could make? Why would I want to be a doctor, or dream up the next great company? How many people would actually be affected by this? The richest 5%? 15%? Where does it end? How does that policy affect the people who are employed by those wealthy people? I think there are more questions than answers with this policy.