I mean seriously they found saddam in a freakin hole in the ground....but yet they can't find osama...somethings wrong here ...should we ask bush where he is??
2006-10-28 16:41:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I spied Bush and Osama on one of those spinning teacup rides at DisneyWorld the other day. They thought I wouldn't recognize them with the mouse-ears, but they were WRONG.
Yeah, they're in cahoots.
2006-10-28 17:46:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The troops found Saddam Hussein partly because he stayed in one area, and was in touch with people. And someone gave him away.
Every case is different. In the case of Osama bin Laden, he may have chosen a better modus operandi, and better hideouts. It is not rational to expect that the two are equivalent.
There is more support now for Osama Laden than ever. And think, Sadam Hussein was hiding too close "to where he s-h-a-t." It's possible that Osama bin Laden has fled from the areas which suffered under the Taliban. It's possible that O. bin Laden is more intelligent, or more wily, than S. Hussein.
There is no evidence nor rationale that Bush would hide O. bin Laden. Specially when Bush needs the ratings. So, I hope you give up the conspiracy theory, or at least get evalutated to make sure you're not given over to paranoia and delusions. I don't mean that to be cruel, but such is a sign of mental illness. Better to be safe than sorry.
2006-10-28 23:47:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Osama gets a lot of walking in to stay ahead of the missles but it does look like they are not trying the same way. Saddam has no friends anywhere.
2006-10-29 00:09:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ridiculous! If they could catch Osama Bin Laden, they would do it. There is lot of rugged country in a lot of places he could be, and he moves around. Also, he has a lot of people who support and help him, and he is more familiar with the terrain than the people who are looking for him. And he is not a fool!
2006-10-28 23:58:36 · answer #4 · answered by Max 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he's hiding him... but he's clearly not TRYING VERY HARD to find him...
150,000 troops looking for Saddam... they find him
20,000 looking for Osama in rougher terrain... they can't find him... BIG SURPRISE...
how in H*LL is Saddam a bigger concern than Osama... because that's how they have prioritized their troops?
they talk about Osama a lot to be TOTALLY half-*ssing on the search....
I mean... if Bush sent 200,000 troops in and still couldn't find him... OK... but a tenth that... that's pathetic...
2006-10-29 00:21:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a good possibility they are hiding him. If they were to capture him then we would be expected to leave Afghanistan, which is a great place to maintain surveillance on the former Soviet Union. I think we are there to try and make sure the Soviet's nuclear weapons can't pass through on their way to Iran.
2006-10-29 01:20:22 · answer #6 · answered by tim b 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good theory... Thier families certainly have 'dealings' and after all a country makes more money in 6 months of war than in 5 years of a healthy economy. They seem to be running out of excuses to keep it running now however...
2006-10-28 23:44:58 · answer #7 · answered by soulgirl76 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
he is not hiding because there not after him never have never will the Bush family have been in bed with the Bin Laden's for decades.
2006-10-28 23:44:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think Bib Laden has been dead for some time now
2006-10-28 23:45:54 · answer #9 · answered by bconehead 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're joking, right?
2006-10-28 23:47:43 · answer #10 · answered by jejordan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋