I think WWe is more entertaining than TNA do you agree with me ............ Yes Or Not
2006-10-28 16:33:50 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
me too good.
2006-10-28 17:16:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
wwe storylines are better but vince is so admant on not allowing his cruiserweight to get too high risk all of the great cruiserweights are in tna and why would u allow kurt angle to leave. that was one of the biggest mistake vince ever made. i frankly like tna's superstars better. ie sting aj styles christopher daniels chris sabin samoa joe elix skipper monty brown lax the dudleys the james gang and that little guy eric is pretty funny to.
2006-10-28 23:59:38 · answer #2 · answered by bigpoppa_2x@verizon.net 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA has better wrestlers old and new like Sting,Jeff Jarret,Scott Steiner,Road Dogg(BG James),Billy Gunn(Kip James),K Kwik(Ron Killings),Samoa Joe,Abyss,Kurt angle and many more.Whenever i watch TNA all the storylines aren't boring unlike WWE.
TNA ROCKS
2006-10-29 10:29:25 · answer #3 · answered by HHH 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-10-28 23:36:37 · answer #4 · answered by Matt: aka; Edge is world champ!! 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no, tna is better because wwe isnt worth it anymore wwe is worthless but guys like undertaker and beniot dont need vince mcmahon to hold them back and waste their talents on worthless wwe talent. its guys like beniot and undertaker are the main reasons to watch wwe and the divas. but other than undertaker and beniot and the divas wwe just plain sucks wwe is just old, boring, stupid, worthless. tna rocks because tna has better wrestlers(not like the undertaker and beniot),more action, the best matches(ultimate x, monsters ball match).
2006-10-29 12:00:11 · answer #5 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dramawise, yes. Though TNA has wrestlers that actually wrestle.
2006-10-29 01:00:11 · answer #6 · answered by irish_mick_25 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many seem to agree with you on this:
WWE programs currently reach over 14 million viewers per week
As you can see WWE has 2 of the top 15 cable shows in America right now. http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/nielsen-more.htm
2006-10-28 23:46:14 · answer #7 · answered by canadianhelper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes I agree with you because WWE has more superstars than TNA
2006-10-29 00:38:58 · answer #8 · answered by baffo@sbcglobal.net 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
for sure, WWE is much more interesting as far as story lines but in all honesty there are TNA stars that should be in WWE
2006-10-28 23:36:53 · answer #9 · answered by I_R_A_7 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes i am still a fan so many people bag the wwe but they would miss it if it finished up
2006-10-28 23:52:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE is way more entertaining.Vince is 10x smarter than that idiot,Dixie Carter who runs TNA.
2006-10-28 23:40:52 · answer #11 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋