English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why is circumcision still routinely performed on 90% of baby boys in America???? They claim that it reduces urine tract infections. In European countries, most boys arnt circumcised and they do not have a higher instance of UTI's than American boys do. Then they say it reduces your chances of getting an STD. Once again European men do not have a higher instance of STD's than American men do. Finally they claim it lowers your chances of getting penile cancer which it doesnt. It does however lower sensitivity by 50% and when the procedure goes wrong its catastrophic to the boy. Why cant women accept men's bodies the way they are. How would women like it if we started routinly removing womens clitoral hoods like they do in Africa.

2006-10-28 16:31:32 · 10 answers · asked by xdfsddfgdfgdfg d 1 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

i got these statistics from nocirc and i confirmed the statistics with a friend of mine who is a urologist

2006-10-28 16:32:05 · update #1

10 answers

The “medical” reasons for circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!
Circumcision is “nothing” compared to other much more terrible things that people do for MONEY, when MONEY is involved EVERYRHING is possible, MONEY is the priority not moral values, not ethics, not health, not wrong or right, not even human life, etc. People are selfish by nature. And that is soooo sad. $$$CASH$$$

MOTHERS, the feelings of mothers who observed the circumcision of their babies. Go here if you have the courage:
http://www.circumcision.org/mothers.htm
They do not remember the pain when they grow up, but I wonder what kind of neurological/emotional damage it does to inflict such severe pain to such a young one!

In the US circumcision started to stop boys from masturbating; they will take much longer to reach the orgasm, and the orgasm will not be as intense, but that will not stop them.
Nowadays the “medical” reasons to circumcision are for Doctors to make MONEY!!!

RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
Also, if you examine the bible, lest just say that is full of terrible things that are considered very illegal nowadays, and many of those terrible things are AGAINST WOMEN. Women, how would you like it if those things get legalized?
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/

HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more “smegma”, all kinds of discharges, wetness, and smells; because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Women are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.

MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. It is not a birth defect! A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. And what is even greater is the chance of breast cancer so the best thing to do is to remove the breast glands of young girls or at least remove them at the first sign of trouble without trying any alternative treatments first in order to preserve the breast(women, how do you like it now?). And for infections of all the organs, including female organs, use a new invention called antibiotics. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if “TRUE phimosis” occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.circinfo.org/alternatives.html
The foreskin can still be tight even after puberty, and it is natural, not TRUE phimosis.
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.

SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circumcised men will have to deal with discomfort and dry glans. Uncircumcised men, pull the foreskin back for a day, and see how it feels against your underwear all day, and see what happens. The frenulum is the G SPOT in men.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!

If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a BIG UPROAR about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parent’s decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him? It is the parent’s decision to choose the son religion? How can he chose a religion or his believes, if he is just a baby?
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html

2006-10-28 23:30:48 · answer #1 · answered by miniboi6666 2 · 2 3

It will depend on which department, Orthodox, Conservative or reform. All would require you to have a interval of research with a Rabbi and give an explanation for why you want to transform. Orthodox and Conversative will regularly require circumsicion if you're male and don't seem to be already. You are required to have a Bar Mitzvah at that factor. If you're now not getting married then it may take relatively a even as, as much as 2 years. You also are larger off when you've got household individuals who're Jewish (fathers facet) despite the fact that that could now not make you Jewish as it's traced by way of the mum, it is helping. Some reform Shuls simplest require slightly research with the Rabbi and paying synagogue dues dues however Orthodoxy and Conservative don't appreciate the ones conversions. Hope this is helping.

2016-09-01 04:10:42 · answer #2 · answered by stufflebeam 4 · 0 0

It's a tradition, people think it's healthier for the boy, and some worry that not doing it will cause social problems cause by being "different". Some people have a hard time confronting their doctor on the issue and go along with it so as not to be seen as strange.

2006-10-28 16:35:40 · answer #3 · answered by dantheman_028 4 · 4 2

It takes long time a real long time to break any idea whether misconveived or not so thats just the way it is and hopefully democaracey will pay ioff but for it too work we all have eto voice our opinions like you just did so kudos to ya

2006-10-28 16:36:30 · answer #4 · answered by Bud 2 · 2 1

I did it to my sons. My boys don't seem to mind and are not any different than their father. Which means no explaining. Unlike with my daughter why I have to explain breasts and many other differences. The majority of people chose the procedure for their children. I'd rather do it when they are babies than to have my sons not be and a woman they love suggest it be done, then cause them great pain when they are older. Bottom line, to each his own.

2006-10-28 16:45:16 · answer #5 · answered by lil_southern_pecan 2 · 1 4

According to an article I read earlier this year studies have shown that circumcision reduces the risk of contracting AIDS by 70 percent.

2006-10-28 17:07:20 · answer #6 · answered by kp 7 · 0 5

Why do you keep asking this question? This is the second time you've asked it in the past two hours. Sounds like an unhealthy fixation to me.

Correction - you've asked this question about four times, in several different ways. Chill, dude. Not everybody is interested in your pen!s.

2006-10-28 17:58:50 · answer #7 · answered by dreamweaver.629ok 3 · 1 5

I did it to my sons,

It doesn't hurt and it makes them feel normal when the take a piss next to other guys.

also even tho the stats say other wise,

logically i would think it would prevent std's simply because its not trapping fluid.

you know like the big hole in the vagina where men empty sperm.

thats just me tho!

2006-10-28 16:37:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 5

Maybe you can ask your urologist friend. He/she seems to have all the facts.

Besides that it is easier to keep the penis clean.

2006-10-28 16:35:28 · answer #9 · answered by sshazzam 6 · 1 4

good q? i didn't get my son circumcized...i seen it as being pointless and painfull......just a status thing

2006-10-28 16:34:25 · answer #10 · answered by amandaped25 4 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers