Yeah, Clinton was smart enough to get caught with his pants down.
That won't happen to Georgie...
2006-10-28 16:29:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Transgénico 7
·
8⤊
2⤋
Hitler was very well spoken. Some of the most evil men who have ever lived had very high IQ's.
And who said Bush has the lowest IQ ever? Where do you guys even get that info? Did you personally know every single president and know their exact IQ?
BTW, Bush is smart. He might not be Liberal Smart, you know where you live with your parents until you are 35, but he would not be president if he was not smart.
And this is from someone who voted for Clinton. twice.
2006-10-28 16:42:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dana Lana 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
You are right about Clinton, everything sounded smart. It was when you started to analyze what he said that you realized he wasn't so smart. I doubt that Bush has the lowest IQ of any president in history, you're just repeating something somebody said without proof. Bush is terrible with off the cuff type of responses, he can be pretty good in prepared speeches.
2006-10-28 17:02:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well, to liberals like yourself who can't read higher than a third grade level - it does sound stupid because you haven't got an IQ high enough to understand the message.
Now, tell mommy you're sorry for touching her PC and go get some milk and cookies mmmkay?
2006-10-28 16:58:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by andyandy28227 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
You're right. Maybe we should elect a leader who is intelligent and well-spoken...like Adolf Hitler.
Yes, Clinton did sound intelligent. Of course, it's now known that he was lying (does the phrase, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" sound familiar?), but I guess that's not important to you.
So, next time, let's elect a smart but dishonest criminal or an eloquent psychopath. Much better choice.
2006-10-28 16:29:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by firemedicgm 4
·
6⤊
1⤋
Why do you repeat yourself all of the time?
Why do you repeat yourself all of the time?
Clinton was so smart he smoked weed and told everyone he didn't inhale. That was real intelligent.
Clinton was so smart he had an affair and lied to America about it under oath. That was real smart.
Clinton was so smart that he had Osama handed to him on at least 2 occasions but he said no thank you. That was real smart.
Clinton was so smart that when the USS Cole was bombed and the World Trade Center was bombed (the first time) he did nothing. That was real smart.
How many more times are you going to ask dumb questions?
2006-10-28 16:37:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
Bush's I Q and grades were better than Clinton's. It just goes to show ya to be wary of the smooth talker.
2006-10-28 16:38:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Because he was drinking when he should have been learning in school. Besides, "cowboys" don't really care for "booklearnin'".
Wait, sorry, he's not a cowboy- he's a Mainer educated at Andover, Yale and Harvard, all East Coast schools. Not a lot of Cowboys from there.
2006-10-28 16:30:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bleaarg 3
·
1⤊
4⤋
LOL!! I get such a kick out of this question. Look at your question!
You are throwing stones here, hon.
2006-10-28 16:43:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
He is a figure head he is not the agenda nor its true spokesman that would be Paul Wolfowitz
2006-10-28 16:29:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by dstr 6
·
0⤊
3⤋