Why did George W Bush invade Iraq, and lie about the connection to the attacks of 9-11?

Question

Why does Osama bin Laden remain free to to train terrorist to attack again, and why does Bush ignore the facts about the Taliban regaining control in Afghanistan,,, Why do republicans support him,, when his own GOP does not?

Answer 1

Because Bush has no logic. The Republican party, who I used to support, is going to hell. Christian fundamentalism is idiotic. The only people that still support Bush can't think for themselves. Even conservatives and some Republicans don't support him.

I know conservatives and Republicans are supposed to be the same thing. It's not the case any more. The idiot that we call president is a radical reactionary that has far surpassed, and oft ignored, the tenets of conservatism such as small government, minimal government spending, and states' rights.

Answer 2

He invaded Iraq because Saddam failed to comply with multiple U.N. resolutions. He discussed the possibility of a connection between Iraq and al-Qaeda because it was considered common knowledge from W.H. Bush's term, Clinton's term, and W. Bush's term. It was based on faulty intelligence that the majority of political leaders believed, especially the three Presidents.

bin Laden is free because of politics. Most intelligence points to him being in Pakistan. Of course, our intelligence has been wrong before. Pakistan swears that he is not, and that he must be in Afghanistan still. Afghanistan swears that he is in Pakistan. Going into Pakistan, even without troops in Iraq, would be a delicate situation. They are a nuclear power. To get bin Laden, NATO forces will have to go through Afghanistan.

Bush is not ignoring anything about the Taliban. He understands and trusts our allies within NATO to get the job done. They are stepping up attacks as we speak.

Republicans support him, even when the GOP does not, because there is no other plan given to accomplish the same goal that Bush wants to obtain. At this juncture, it is either leave it to the generals to decide, or leave Iraq as fast as possible. Leaving is not a realistic nor logical option. It would be great if somebody, from either party, would speak up and take control of the situation. Until that happens, to me anyway, Bush's feeble attempt is the best we got going.

I know you won't pick this answer Neddie. You only ask questions to get others like you to vent out their frustrations. Maybe if we all start working on a solution other than the ones that have already been discussed, we can get back to worrying about what really matters, this country. That can't happen when we have to clean up our mess on the other side of the world. We need a real plan to achieve that goal, and then move forward.

Answer 3

why did John Kerry, say if you don,t believe Saddam Housane has weapons of mass distruction don't vote for me. Why did Hillery Clinton, and all the democrat members of the House and Senate Intelligence committees agree that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Why did Saddam ignore 17 UN resolutions to allow nuclear weapons inspectors access to his weapons facilities. Osama is not free he's sitting in a cave and the terrorist are in Iraq. The Taliban doesn't control Afghanistan. We support the President because he protects us That's his job. And where do you get off thinking his party doesn't support him You' been brained washed by the liberal media

Answer 4

Couldn't have said it better than Boof:
"Unlike with BJ Clinton, Bin Laden wasn't offered up on a silver platter. He is deep in hiding in one of the most inhospitable areas on the planet. The Taliban are regrouping - they have not regained control of anything. Do you remember the UN resolutions? Do you remember Saddam thumbing his nose at the world? He agreed to let the inspectors in, and reneged on the agreement. He made his own bed. Iraq had been a major supporter of international terrorism. He tried to assassinate a former American President (Doesn't matter who it was - Americans don't tolerate that from anybody, let alone a two bit dictator!). He had WMD's and used them on the Kurds and Iranians. He treated al qaida wounded in his hospitals and gave them refuge. You have absolutely no grasp in the reality of the world - it is a very dangerous place and thanks to President Bush we haven't been attacked again! You and the other libs should be thanking him! "

Answer 5

Its Not that He Doesn't Ignore Him, Its Just It was easier for him and his Administration to catch Saddam Hussein then Osama Bin Laden, and It would a Waste of Everybody Tax-paying Dollars to kill our Young Americans into Enemy Terrority, and If we Pull Out the Troops they'll (Bush Administration) will call our Suggestion "Cut and Run" well No Exit Strategy at all.

If Republicans Continue to Support President Bush, Voters will condemn the GOP Candidate as much as they Condemn President Bush.

That's Something to think About.

Answer 6

Osama is not free. He has to hide in hole in mountain like a gopher. If he sticks his head out, we got him.

The Taliban has not regained control, and they never will. We will just keep killing the bastards.

We still support him because we know the truth. Unlike you you stupid lemming. Keep following the dems, and drown. Why do you not seek the truth? Why do you keep listening to the lies put forth by the liberals? I will tell you why, because you are stupid!

Why can the democrats not give one solution to the problems in Iraq? Because they could not do it any better that's why. And one more thing you moron, do you remember the Twin towers? I doubt it. I am sorry for loosing my temper, but you people really piss me off! You want to hear lies? Listen to your Democrat buddies. Hey! "I did not have sexual relations with that woman. Start with that one." And Howard Dean is the biggest liar on the face of the planet and a certified nut! And you do not call him on any of it either. Take a look in the mirror.

Can you just imagine the Democraps, (Ya I spelled it right.), turning their venom loose on the rest of the world? What would happen if one of your dems became president and mouthed off to the Chinese president? Or started telling lies about him the way they do Mr. Bush? Crawl back into your hole. Maybe you can give more aid and comfort to the enemy from their.
Give me abreak! Get a life will ya?

Answer 7

Unlike with BJ Clinton, Bin Laden wasn't offered up on a silver platter. He is deep in hiding in one of the most inhospitable areas on the planet. The Taliban are regrouping - they have not regained control of anything. Do you remember the UN resolutions? Do you remember Saddam thumbing his nose at the world? He agreed to let the inspectors in, and reneged on the agreement. He made his own bed. Iraq had been a major supporter of international terrorism. He tried to assassinate a former American President (Doesn't matter who it was - Americans don't tolerate that from anybody, let alone a two bit dictator!). He had WMD's and used them on the Kurds and Iranians. He treated al qaida wounded in his hospitals and gave them refuge. You have absolutely no grasp in the reality of the world - it is a very dangerous place and thanks to President Bush we haven't been attacked again! You and the other libs should be thanking him!

Answer 8

in case you quite wanted to be honest there is fairly some persons which could take the blame for 9/11 whose names by no potential arise. It replaced into no longer one persons fault and it wasn't some thing that befell in one day. The truly unhappy factor and it is glaring with the help of people who responded you all are so into the blame interest you thoroughly ignore what ought to have been found out with the help of this. Do you recognize in basic terms how vast this comparable terrorist team is acceptable right here interior the rustic??? and what's being performed approximately it? precisely, no longer something so are you all going to stand around and blame Obama for no longer doing some thing approximately it such as you're Bush? no longer hardly. the answer to procure from the single that wish's he lived in N. u . s . of america truly have been given to me, perhaps you and absolutely everyone who responded ought to provide his answer some concept!

Answer 9

Because he only likes to hear his people under him say what he wants. He used the same flawed intel that the Clinton administration gathered. But at least Bush didn't have sex in the white house. President Clinton wanted to invade Iraq also, but then, the neo-cons said that there was no proof of WMD's, etc., so the Republicans blocked it. They said that he was just trying to cover up his 'terrible, terrible', heterosexual exploits in the white house. Just think, we would just now be pulling out of Iraq and we could have blamed President Clinton for the mess in Iraq, and not President Bush. But, then again, at least Bush did not have sex in the white house.

Answer 10

Neddie, I think this whole Iraqi war thing was hatched in a meeting with the large oil company's. If you remember in the early years of this failed presidency he called the oil company's into a secret meeting to set energy policy. I think the war in Iraq was conspired in that meeting. If you upset and cause turmoil in the middle east then the price of oil and its profits go up. Bush thought that Iraq would be an easy sister (he was wrong about that too) So he set out to build a case against going to war with the people of Iraq. 9/11 happened and the case was closed. The sheep followed because of the patriotism that was felt right after 9/11 but people are getting wise to this evil man now. We will see in this election how bad it is. If the democrats take over congress we can neutralize him and make him the true lame duck president that he needs to be before he can do anymore damage to this country.