My ceiling/tiles have been leaking since Oct. of 2005. It only started with one tile but became worse over the year. It literally rains inside my apt. when it rains out and has affected 11 tiles now. I made the mistake of only putting a request in writing for repair once but have documented every conversation, days they came in to look at it, days when it was supposedly fixed, and a few weeks ago when a professional finally came in. (The pro did say to call if the problem wasn't fixed.) My landlord told me several times that if worse came to worse they would put a tarp over the roof. I have requested this repeatedly and this much I have in writing. I paid my November rent and the landlord(s) said that they don't want to deal with the "leaks" problem anymore and that they just wanted to use the apt for storage. IMPORTANT: They have not been claiming this apt. on their taxes (it's connected to their house) for the last 13 yrs and I believe they are afraid to get caught. Mold too
2006-10-28
13:56:15
·
10 answers
·
asked by
LuvsKitty's
1
in
Home & Garden
➔ Maintenance & Repairs
UPDATE: Low and behold, they served me a 30 day WRITTEN, but very inaccurate, notice to leave by Nov 30th. This came following a complaint filed to the board of health just today. (They will be here tomorrow.) The letter states/names the landlord as the landlady's husband, Joe. He told me repeatedly that he is NOT my/the landlord. He just does the repairs. His wife owns the house. She is the landlady. Also, they will not produce receipts for me proving that I lived here since Sept. 2005. Plenty of relatives/friends/neighbors as witnesses. AND no, I am not leaving. I will wait for the 30 days and let it proceed to court. I am covered. They do not have a good reason for asking me to leave other than, "we don't want to deal with the leak problem anymore". Sorry but I'm standing up for my rights and fighting tooth & nail. I will later decide AFTER the hearing if I chose to leave. The judge will not ask me to leave because there is not good enough reason. Again, this was a verbal lease.
2006-10-30
10:00:08 ·
update #1