English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ted Kennedy has acknowledged that Ronald Reagan "will be honored as the president who won the Cold War." But if a letter from the head of the KGB to Soviet leader Yuri Andropov is authentic and accurate, then Kennedy offered to work with the Soviets to undermine the very efforts by Reagan that brought us that victory.

The letter, dated May 14 1983, features in a new book by Paul Kengor called The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism discussed here by the Washington Times. In the letter, KGB head Viktor Chebrikov describes a message he received from Kennedy through Kennedy pal and former U.S. Senator John Tunney. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy (through Tunney) expressed concern with "Reagan's belligerence" and the fact that antipathy towards the Soviets will be an important issue in the 1984 presidential campaign. Kennedy stated that the peaceful intentions of the Soviets weren't being given their due by the president or the media. He therefore proposed a meeting with Soviet officials in which he would "arm" them with arguments "so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA." He also suggested that Andropov made himself available for interviews by media in the U.S.

In short, if the KGB man's account is accurate, Kennedy was working with the Soviets to undermine Reagan's hard line policies and influence the 1984 election. As Kengor puts it:

If the memo is in fact an accurate account of what transpired, it constitutes a remakable example of the lengths to which some on the political left, including a sitting U.S. senator, were willing to go to stop Ronald Reagan.

Raise your hand if you believe that Ted Kennedy and today's left-wing Democrats are above this sort of behavior when it comes to stopping President Bush.

Soviet archives also indicate that Jimmy Carter and Tip O'Neill offered to collaborate with the Russians to undermine Reagan.

2006-10-28 13:22:36 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

14 answers

Catholic Ted Kennedy wanted to become the President so he would do whatever it takes to become politically relevant. Ted Kennedy and Jimmy Carter aligned enemies of the USA to serve their Religious Right conservative agenda. Catholic politicians would like Pope to rule USA or work towards creating Catholic United States by partitoning secular WASP led USA.
Ted Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski represent the Evil Core of the Axis of Medieval in American Politics.
Just as the CIA bribes foreign politicians and implants presidents and prime ministers in Third World countries and Europe, similarly many american Senators and Congressmen are on the payroll of foreign powers, foreign potentates or foreign agencies to meet the requirement of ever rising campaign costs. America has its share of corrupt politicians and traitors, just like India, China, Britain, Russia and Japan.
What was the response of Ted Kennedy to John F. Kennedy to risk nuclear war on Cuban Missile Crisis 1962.
However, President Ronald Reagan was no saint, as his biographer declared that the bullet he received in the assassination attempt made him airhead President for the remaining 6 years of his two term presidency.
I have written on the corruption of the politicians and would like to leave following references.
Chapter 11, Treason of Rulers Diplomats Bureaucrats
http://kalkigaur.googlepages.com/11
KALKI GAUR
kalkipkgaur@yahoo.com
General Blog URL http://indiatalking.com/blog/kalkigaur

2006-10-28 14:20:52 · answer #1 · answered by diplomacyofcivilizations 1 · 0 0

If the Soviets were relying on Ted Kennedy to "arm them with arguments" that were appealing to Americans, the perhaps old Ted should be credited with the fall of the Soviet Empire. If this is true, it is obviously treasonous. When I can stop rolling on the floor laughing, maybe I will be able to get angrier. With friends like Ted, the Soviets needed no enemies

2006-10-28 14:54:32 · answer #2 · answered by FabMom 4 · 0 0

If this is true, they should each be investigated and evidence brought forth for possible charges to be pressed. I certainly can see the possibility given the collaboration between Jimmy Carter and the enemies of late as well as Clinton with the Chinese while he held office. But I need evidence before I'm going to propagate the rumor. Do you have links to back up your statements?
I will be happy to blog over at http://judgeright.blogspot.com along with my other posts on Islamo fascist agendas self stated if I can put fool proof evidence with the post.

2006-10-28 14:13:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i do not comprehend in case you are able to call them traitors yet they absolutely are a slimy crew. Murtha and Kennedy voted for the warfare and Hanoi Jane began renouncing her previous positions about 4 years in the past even as it became sparkling that folk did not look after her anymore. in spite of the indisputable fact that, in basic terms lately she confirmed up at an anti warfare rally yet suggested she became there to help the troops by technique of bringing them abode. they are in basic terms political opportunists no different than the extreme flag waving officials who use subject matters which incorporates this for own income. Kennedy is completely one of the most ineffective elected reputable in us of a.

2016-12-05 08:09:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I have also heard this story and I agree with you that this would make kennedy a traitor. I'll also bet you that this information will never be published by the mainstream media and you'll be very lucky if Yahoo allows it to remain on Answers.

2006-10-28 14:11:20 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

Yes, that would clearly put Kennedy in with the traitor crowd, along with John Kerry and other Leftists.

Americans are frightfully ignorant of the networking Leftists do to ensure progressive victories against America. This is why Democrats are furious about the removal of Saddam Hussein - the Socialist strongman in the Middle East - and are engaged in all-out propaganda war against the US. When they cried "Vietnam" when the cease-fire was called off, it was a rallying cry to American Leftists to restart their anti-American protests and propaganda machines.

2006-10-28 13:25:17 · answer #6 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 6 1

There is not any doubt in my mind that we have a select few including teddy boy and p-nut man who have been trying to undermine the President and the war on terror.They are a hateful bunch!

2006-10-28 13:27:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

There are lots of people who would laugh at the possibility of changing their destinies. This is because it thinks that no one gets more that exactly what is written in his destiny.

2016-05-17 15:39:03 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

How does he still get to be a Senator!

Tell me libs don't hate the country...

2006-10-28 13:51:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, but if so it would make him as big a fool as the person who had this pipe dream

2006-10-28 13:32:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers