If a Democrat becomes president in 2008 are you going to blame the failure of Iraq on them?

Answer 1

Yes, the Republicans plan to do just that.

Answer 2

Probably, but the vast majority of the blame will come from the millions of Iraq citizens who made an effort to vote and participate in a true democracy while they are being tortured and executed by the newly installed extremist militia leaders who are hellbent on driving them deep into the stone age, that is if they allow anyone to live.

It will be a Pol Pot kind of thing.

Yeah know what I mean jellybean?

Answer 3

Only if they declare a loss, pull out the troupes and abandon Iraq. Then, yes, I will blame the failure on the Democrats. And any future attacks on the US as well will be their fault.

Answer 4

Blame is in an fairly substantial volume, and prefer different failing, there are "much" of it, unfold to all !!! The financing / appropriations for the militia attempt, is / became a needed mandate, for without a top manned militia, the U. S. might without delay replace right into a "territory" of yet another u . s . !!! (might you pick for to stay below a chinese language rule, artwork all day for $one million.50 to $2.00 an afternoon??? This ol' fowl thinks no longer !!) Irregardless of the political ideology one has, there are "NO sparkling" previous POSITIONS, purely finger pointing in hopes / efforts to cover someones previous transgressions !!! Neo-cons / neo-libs / dems / reps / indeps / ALL HAVE grimy hands !!!! The loop sided information comments are meant to unfold mistrust, discouragement, and avarice to the masses. I certainly have spoken, in my opinion to quite a few troupes, who've back homestead, from "the front lines", and that they are bewildered relating to the information medias consistent detrimental reporting relating to the "low ethical". IF the moral is so low, how come there are a super form of re-enlistments between people who've experienced the riggers of actually conflict ??? toro gringo

Answer 5

Well, lets see. Clinton was in office during all the years of all those terrorist attacks and planning of 911--he did nothing to deter them. Bush took office and had 7 months before he was blamed as he was in office WHEN IT HAPPENED. Bush would've been blamed if it happened during his inauguration. So, it would only make sense that if a Dem is the sitting President, that they take the blame. Oh wait, nothing is NEVER the Dems fault.

Answer 6

I doesn't matter who is pres it's congress that approves funding. who ever con trolls the money con trolls the war.
If Iraq fails it's there people who have not stepped up to the plate to defend them selves. They are half way there with having elections. Iraqi's are dieing at the rate of about 10 of them to 1 of us.
Personally I think we should have dropped leaflets saying
we are about to bomb the c88P out of you if you want to live get out of town. Then bombs away. As with the Hebrews, Iraq's will have to breed out the damage done by the Mullahs who have brainwashed the country.
Shakespeare said First kill all the Lawyers. I say First kill all the Mullahs.

Answer 7

Whoever is elected will be blamed for everything that is wrong with America. I'm a democrat but I wouldn't mind if a Republican had one more 4 year term to take some heat. If Republican's get one more term, no one will elect one again...If a Republican wins this term it will really be a win for Democrats in some respect.

In the long run....so let the Republicans take one more head beating before the Democrats come.

Answer 8

No one will do that in 2008...because...Pres. Clinton has already been blamed for everything between the Stock Market crash of 1929 and the war in Iraq!

Answer 9

Nope, I myself am a democrat. I blame, well, the person who started it, Bush.

Answer 10

republicans will, yes. they will say they "cut and run" or that they failed to "build on the success of prez idiot W." That's the healthy democratic 2 party system, innit?