2006-10-28 12:51:29 · 2 answers · asked by ree_na00 1 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
It would mean that in yuor opinion his frame of reference is close to that of what you perceive to be the archetypal bureaucrat. It would imply that there is such a thing as "the" bureaucratic personality "of our times" -- that is, that there exists an archetype that most, or at least many, bureaucrats substantially conform to, and that this archetype is perhaps only applicable to the current, turn-of-the-millennium, time and not to bureaucrats of other times, recent (e.g. during the days before universal television watching) or longer ago (e.g. those running the Byzantine Empire in the 1100s).
2006-10-31 22:50:05 · answer #1 · answered by MBK 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More correctly, a useless bureaucrat..
Of course, that is redundant...
2006-10-29 01:14:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋