Then how come he vetoed a stem cell bill, when over 80% of the nation supports stem cell research?
2006-10-28 11:23:46 · 8 answers · asked by Blalalalal 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"no stem cell ,its wrong that's why,so if 80% of the people want to do something then the president must do it even if all those people ,are wrong. that's the deal lemon peel.."
And what makes it wong? Because you feel it is?
The majority of the world disagrees with you.
2006-10-28 11:35:05 · update #1
And whay are we still in Iraq as support erodes
2006-10-28 11:27:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Where do you get that number? And I doubt that you even know what the real issue is about. Stem cell research is legal and funded across the nation... even the Federal government funds it. It is *Embryonic* Stem Cells that are the issue. To date *NOTHING* has come from that research. Which would be enough for me to keep Federal dollars out of that research. Adult stem cells are a different matter. There has been a lot of promising research and results from them. At least get your facts straight before you pick your battles.
2006-10-28 18:43:43 · answer #2 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no stem cell ,its wrong that's why,so if 80% of the people want to do something then the president must do it even if all those people ,are wrong. that's the deal lemon peel..
2006-10-28 18:33:28 · answer #3 · answered by CIVILIAN 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The private sector provides more than enough money for the research, and besides.......... 99% of the people wanted the Patriot Act renewed and 99% of the libs voted against it.
2006-10-28 18:31:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He SHOULD represent the countries interest's. He is beholden to the Religious Right and he has to rule in their favor. He's also someone who doesn't care about people who need help, where he can save lives.
2006-10-28 18:29:21 · answer #5 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
>"Supposed to" and "majority rule" mean nothing to those who desire absolute power as fervently as our current President. He is simply an ignorant "King Wannabee", and will be a small footnote to history.<
2006-10-28 18:29:06 · answer #6 · answered by Druid 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You will never get a reasonable answers from the republican conservatives with this question, my child.
2006-10-28 18:31:50 · answer #7 · answered by me_worry? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Fascism has it's own agenda.
2006-10-28 18:26:21 · answer #8 · answered by flip4449 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋