Isnt this the Imperial Presidency Cheney and Rumsfeld setup for Bush? He could not have done this on his own. Its not even remotely Constitutional.
2006-10-28 10:40:38 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Super, this would be true if we were not a one-party state for these past 6 years. Redistricting, gerrymandering, and Rove's wedge issue tactics has placed the GOP in charge of the House, Senate, Executive and for the most part the Judiciary branches. Congress will rubber stamp our losing habeas corpus as it did on 10/17/06
2006-10-28 10:50:40 · update #1
Matt: I don't think you have been paying attention to the last 6 years. So am I to understand Bush has been appointing LIBERALS to the USSC?
Can you........point them out ?
2006-10-28 10:55:29 · update #2
Yupcha... The press has given Bush a free ride for years. Thank god ABC broke the Foley story but I wondeer why it did.
2006-10-28 10:56:58 · update #3
No we don't want that type of Government although the Bush administration wants to force it on us. We have to vote for change and send Bush home to Texas to be Crawfords village idiot once again!
2006-10-28 10:47:13 · answer #1 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, but you want a Supreme Court to be unaccountable, as long as the majority of its members lean left and are influenced by what the Washington Post says about them.
2006-10-28 17:52:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Pres is accountable. ongress can cut off funding & even impeach a Pres & remove him from office. The courts can strike down Presidential decisions.
2006-10-28 17:46:24 · answer #3 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You need to do a little research on how the government works, Have you ever heard of congress and Senate?
2006-10-28 17:46:27 · answer #4 · answered by supervfive 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
this is not WWII era Japan and your civic teachers suck if you believe that
2006-10-28 17:44:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋