Why was it ok for people to speak so ill of Pres Clinton but its treason if one says anything of Pres Bush?

Question

What happened to free speech? When did it die? Was it a casualty of the Bush wars in the Middle East?

Answer 1

Clinton worked under the constitution of the United States. Under said constitution we had freedom of speech which meant you could critisize the president without fear of torture...Bush has since changed things a bit.

Answer 2

I don't know what rock you've been living under, but people have not been making any secret of speaking ill about Bush. I dare say I might have heard more criticism of Bush during his first term and-a-half than I have of Clinton during both terms and the 6 years since.

Answer 3

If anything Bush is more criticised then any other president, Clinton flat out lied to the public and got caught and people still consider him a great president, the only thing bush is guilty of is having good values.

Answer 4

There is a different between Mr Clinton and Mr Bush. Mr Clinton was f----- every women in the White House and that was unmoral. Mr Bush is using everything in his power to safe guard the American people and our country from terrorist. That's the different. God bless our president.

Answer 5

Since when is it treason to criticise Bush? If it were, half the people on this board would now be on death row.

Answer 6

this isn't genuine coming from Clinton, as even as he ran for place of work his first time period, his mantra became, "that is the business equipment, stupid" then absolutely one of his first acts as president, to his Democratic managed congress, became to furnish us the biggest tax boost in heritage up till that aspect. This has been the Democrats answer to each and every thing, tax ! PonPon: quote" "humorous, that’s what they suggested till now Clinton’s tax will boost in ninety 3. surely, we balanced the funds through Clinton tax rates and the rustic loved unemployment as low as 3.8%". once you're saying we, i anticipate you're that means that it became the Democrats that balanced the funds and communicate of the countries employment cost. So, shall we go over those claims, first, Clinton and his spend like loopy gang did not stability any funds, it became through Republicans taking up congress in 1994 that resulted contained in the spending being further less than administration. and the funds being managed. next the declare with reference to the unemployment cost, sure authentic, yet, that became till now Clinton signed the NAFTA bill, permitting the jobs to be outsourced to different countries without the tariff being accrued, that resulted in mass activity losses.

Answer 7

talking bad about Bush is not treason. The treason part comes when you encourage the enemy by saying "we'll cut and run at the earliest oportunity"- which is the same as if you said "hold on Osama, just a little longer, and victory is yours"

Answer 8

wow...what color is the sky in your world?...the left wing based media is always slamming bush...and praising Clinton....didn't ya watch the interview of bill on fox?...he had a melt down when the reporter asked him some tough questions.....the left wing media loves Clinton(Mr, and ms.)...also Howard dean...Michael moore....ect...
last time i checked ...free speech was alive and well in the good ole us of a.

Answer 9

They're using Carl Rove as a consultant to help place answers if people criticize Bush.

Answer 10

Speak the truth and no one cares...
Ill spoken of Clinton was usually true..
Ill spoken of Bush is usually not true...